A girl pays traffic fines of 69,000 dirhams from a young man's card

The court ordered the girl to return the money to the young man.

archival

The Abu Dhabi Court for Family and Civil and Administrative Claims ordered a girl to pay 69,369 dirhams to a young man whose credit card she used to pay traffic violations against, and refused to return the amount, claiming that it was a gift from him to help her.

In the details, a young man filed a lawsuit in which he demanded to oblige a girl to return him 69,369 dirhams and return the credit card as well, and oblige her to pay fees and expenses, noting that he handed the girl his credit card issued by a local bank, in order to deposit an amount that she would use in conducting online shopping transactions. However, she took advantage of her obtaining the card and disbursed the amount of the claim, and did not take the initiative to deposit it again, and when he asked her to pay the amount, she delayed, and she refused to hand him the card, and attached a document to his claim with photocopies of an account statement issued by the bank.

During the consideration of the case, the girl confirmed that she used the amount to pay traffic violations, and that it was a gift from the young man, and they did not agree to return it, and requested a delay to submit a reply note.

The court decided to direct the complementary oath to the plaintiff, and he swore it in the form of “I swear by Almighty God that I handed over the defendant the credit card, after we agreed that she would use it and deposit sums of money on her side, and that I did not hand her that card and the sums of money in it as a gift.”

In the ruling’s merits, the court stated that the complementary oath is nothing but a measure taken by the judge on his own initiative in his desire to investigate the truth to complete incomplete evidence when the case is devoid of complete evidence, noting that the account statements submitted by the plaintiff and translated are a legal translation and the defendant’s acknowledgment constitutes preliminary evidence. , but it is insufficient, especially since the statements and acknowledgment do not explain the reason for using the credit card and the transaction that took place between the two parties to the litigation, and accordingly, the case was straightened and the girl’s preoccupation proved correct, and the court ruled to oblige the defendant to pay the plaintiff 69,369 dirhams, and oblige her to pay fees and expenses .

Follow our latest local and sports news and the latest political and economic developments via Google news