Al-Ain court dismissed the case

A man demands 65 thousand dirhams in compensation from his wife. She accused him of beating her

Marital disputes developed into records and issues.

expressive image

A woman accused her husband of beating her, and after obtaining his acquittal from the accusation, he demanded 65,000 dirhams in compensation. In any case, the availability of the error corner on the wife's side.

In detail, a man filed a lawsuit against his wife, demanding that she pay him compensation for material and moral damages in the amount of 65 thousand dirhams, and the legal interest at 12%, noting that the defendant is his wife with the correct legal contract, and he provided for her on the marital bed with six children, and that she raised A personal status lawsuit requesting a divorce, and it was rejected for lack of evidence, and to prove that there was harm, she filed a report accusing him of assaulting her by beating, and a criminal case was registered on him, in which he was acquitted of the accusation against him, and those malicious lawsuits and the report caused him damages, which required compensation The defendant submitted a memorandum requesting the dismissal of the case.

In the ruling, the court stated that reporting crimes is a public right, whether for the victim or other individuals, and it does not require the reporter to confirm in advance the validity of what he is being informed of, as this is the case with the competent investigation authorities, so the reporter is not asked for compensation for what may The amount of damages will be inflicted against him, unless the matter is an abuse of this right, noting that the plaintiff has filed his claim for compensation for the material and moral damages he sustained, as a result of the defendant’s abuse of the right to sue by complaint, and it was clear from the papers that the defendant had submitted her complaint Against the plaintiff, accusing him of assaulting her, and the plaintiff was acquitted due to the court's questioning of the validity of the accusation against the accused, which does not in any way interrupt the presence of the element of error on the defendant's side.

She explained that the papers and documents were empty, indicating that the defendant's act was caused by bad intent or undermining the plaintiff, and it was not proven from the facts and judgments that intentionally harming him, and the incorrectness of the reported incident, and thus avoiding haste, recklessness or negligence in using the right to complain or report and file The lawsuits or would bring them out within the scope of the use of the legitimate right, and the papers were devoid of what could be considered the foregoing, but was considered a cause for maliciousness, which is what the court considers the act attributed to the defendant as a legitimate use of the right to report, and to file lawsuits, free from arbitrariness guaranteed by the Constitution and the law The fault necessitating the liability is negated, and the plaintiff’s request for compensation was unsubstantiated and must be rejected, and the court ruled to reject the case, and obligated him to pay fees and expenses.

Follow our latest local and sports news and the latest political and economic developments via Google news