"Abu Dhabi Education" has set 4 criteria for evaluating them

5 levels for rating the performance of teachers in Abu Dhabi

School principals are responsible for evaluating teachers in their schools.

From the source

The Abu Dhabi Education Council has identified five levels for classifying teachers after their evaluation, which includes the “initial establishment stage, establishment, upgrading, empowerment, and mastery.”

A source in the council confirmed that school principals are responsible for evaluating teachers and heads of departments in their schools, and the council's electronic performance evaluation system is used.

18 indicators

The Abu Dhabi Education Council has identified 18 indicators, to identify the strengths and weaknesses of each teacher, and the training plans and programs he needs.

Indicators include commitment to the school’s vision, commitment to continuous professional development, fulfillment of responsibilities assigned to it, extent of knowledge of the scientific content and educational concepts, its contribution to the educational community, commitment to teaching the curriculum, modification of teaching methods and means, keenness on the diversity of educational experiences, and its plans to encourage students to think creatively. Plans for providing educational experiences, participation of students in the educational process, treating students with respect, providing a safe learning environment, providing constructive feedback to students and their families, making better use of educational resources, providing feedback on the level of progress of students’ performance to their families, providing them with information about the course explanation plan, and participation in the expanded school community.

He explained that the evaluation policy, which was approved this year, is based on four criteria, including the professional standard, which includes self-expression, performance development, cooperation and leadership, and the curriculum standard, which includes educational knowledge, use of learning resources, planning and preparation, and evaluation, and the third criterion for the semester, which includes Effective teaching and learning methods, differentiated learning, classroom management, creating a safe learning environment, and the last criterion is specific to the community, and includes relationships with parents, reporting, communication skills, and the local community, pointing out that there are performance indicators to measure each standard, and confirmed evidence from It would clarify what should be done in the classroom, as the teacher aims to master the teaching and learning strategies directed to students at the highest possible levels.

The evaluation policy divided the process of classifying teachers after their evaluation into five levels, starting from the lowest to the highest, and including the initial establishment stage, which indicates that teachers cannot meet performance indicators, or they can only meet some of them, at a non-advanced level.

At this stage, the teacher needs support in order to improve performance immediately by implementing a performance development plan.

The second stage is the foundation stage, during which the teacher reaches a satisfactory level, but it requires immediate improvement in performance in some areas of paramount importance to students.

At this stage, the teacher can partially fulfill some performance measurement indicators.

Followed by the stage of promotion, in which the teacher reaches a level of good performance where he can identify the areas in which he can improve performance, and at this stage the teacher becomes personally responsible for developing his performance to reach the next level.

The mastery stage indicates that the teacher has reached a very good level of performance;

Where he can fully meet most of the performance indicators with a high degree, and the last stage is the stage of mastery, which means that the teacher has reached a superior level of global performance;

It can fully meet all performance indicators to a very high degree.

The source explained that based on the level of performance, the school principal submits his observations to the teacher formally;

The director also works in cooperation with the heads of departments to define the goals to be achieved during the school year, and to develop a plan to develop the individual performance of each teacher.

He pointed out that the professional standards for school principals are represented in five basic points, all of which represent the role of the principal, and include strategic leadership, leadership of the teaching and learning process, leadership of the educational institution, leadership of individuals, and leadership of society, pointing out that school group managers are the ones who evaluate the performance of school principals according to for those standards;

With the help of the group manager, managers evaluate their deputies using the same criteria, while being aware of the difference in the role of the assistant manager from the manager himself. These evaluations represent the basis for the professional development plan for the manager and his deputy for the next year.

Follow our latest local and sports news and the latest political and economic developments via Google news