China News Service, Nanchang, August 20 (Reporter Li Yunhan Huashan) From 9:30 am on August 18th to 6:00 pm on the 20th, the Higher People's Court of Jiangxi Province publicly heard Lao Rongzhi's intentional homicide, robbery, and kidnapping appeal. a case.
The Jiangxi Provincial People's Procuratorate assigned prosecutors to appear in court to perform their duties, and the appellant, Lao Rongzhi, and his entrusted defenders appeared in court to participate in the proceedings.
The second instance of the Lao Rongzhi case, which lasted for three days, ended on the afternoon of the 20th in the Jiangxi Higher People's Court, and the verdict will be pronounced on a scheduled date.
Photo courtesy of Jiangxi High Court
The first-instance judgment of the Nanchang Intermediate People's Court found that between 1996 and 1999, the defendants, Lao Rongzhi and Faziying (which had been judged in a separate case), conspired and divided the labor. Faziying committed violence, and successively committed 4 crimes of robbery, kidnapping and intentional homicide in Nanchang City, Jiangxi Province, Wenzhou City, Zhejiang Province, Changzhou City, Jiangsu Province, and Hefei City, Anhui Province, resulting in the death of 7 victims.
After the incident, Lao Rongzhi absconded with aliases such as "Shirley" and was arrested by the public security organs on November 28, 2019.
The second instance of the Lao Rongzhi case, which lasted for three days, ended on the afternoon of the 20th in the Jiangxi Higher People's Court, and the verdict will be pronounced on a scheduled date.
Photo courtesy of Jiangxi High Court
The Nanchang Intermediate People's Court ruled that the defendant, Lao Rongzhi, was guilty of intentional homicide, robbery, and kidnapping, and was punished for several crimes. It was decided to execute the death penalty, deprive him of political rights for life, and confiscated all personal property; compensate the plaintiff in the incidental civil lawsuit Loss of more than 48,000 yuan.
Lao Rongzhi appealed against the criminal part of the original judgment.
During the second-instance trial, the appellant, Lao Rongzhi, his defender, and the procurator who appeared in court fully expressed their opinions on whether Lao Rongzhi constituted intentional homicide, his status and role in the joint crime, whether the first-instance sentencing was too severe, and whether the first-instance procedure was illegal. , Lao Rongzhi made the final statement.
The court announced an adjournment and sentencing at a later date.
The second instance of the Lao Rongzhi case, which lasted for three days, ended on the afternoon of the 20th in the Jiangxi Higher People's Court, and the verdict will be pronounced on a scheduled date.
Photo courtesy of Jiangxi High Court
According to the requirements of epidemic prevention and control, more than 80 people from relatives of victims, appellants, media reporters, representatives of the National People's Congress, members of the Chinese People's Political Consultative Conference and people from all walks of life watched the trial by video.
(Finish)