• Many Internet users share a video of Gabriel Attal, Minister Delegate, in charge of Public Accounts, in which, then spokesperson, he would admit that France violated the Minsk protocol by selling arms to Ukraine after 2014.

  • The Minsk Protocol, followed by a follow-up Memorandum and Minsk II, brings together agreements to calm the situation between Russia, Ukraine and the separatists from 2014.

  • None of these agreements stipulates that it is forbidden to sell or supply arms to Ukraine.

Did Gabriel Attal make a mistake?

According to many Internet users, the Minister Delegate, in charge of Public Accounts, would have revealed, during a press conference, crucial information: France has been supplying arms to Ukraine since 2014.

If the video dates from April 13, it has been released since this Saturday on social networks.

Then government spokesperson, Gabriel Attal declared: “Since 2014, and the beginning of this conflict militarily (sic), France has been the first supplier of arms to the Ukrainians.

»

Crucial information for these Internet users who argue that by revealing it, the minister would have confessed to the violation by France of the Minsk protocol, the agreement signed on September 5, 2014 and intended to end the war in Donbass.

Many even see it as an encouragement for continued fighting in eastern Ukraine that would have led to Russia's invasion of Ukraine.

But it's wrong.

FAKE OFF

The Minsk Protocol was signed by representatives of Ukraine, Russia and insurgents from the "self-proclaimed people's republics" of Donetsk and Luhansk to end the fighting that had been raging in the east of the country since last month. of February 2014, commonly referred to as the “War of Donbass”.

This agreement, drawn up by representatives of the two countries as well as those of the Organization for Security and Cooperation in Europe (OSCE), comprises twelve points (available on the website of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs).

Immediate and bilateral ceasefire, release of hostages, continuation of dialogue, border surveillance, humanitarian situation… these points were intended to ensure a return to a peaceful situation.

Only one point, number 10, speaks openly about weapons: “To proceed with the withdrawal from Ukrainian territory of illicit armed formations and military equipment, as well as irregular fighters and mercenaries.

»

Several agreements signed...

After several violations of the ceasefire in the days following the signing of the protocol, the parties added a follow-up Memorandum agreed on September 19, 2014. This one focuses more on fighting and weapons with one point in particular: “ suppression of all heavy weapons in an area of ​​fifteen kilometers behind the line of contact, by each party to the conflict, in order to create a demilitarized zone thirty kilometers wide in all.

»

Questionable information?

Go through WhatsApp

Faced with the failure of these resolutions, a new summit, called Minsk II, was organized in the Belarusian capital in February 2015 in order to continue negotiations.

If the measures are confirmed, new, firmer ones appear such as forgiveness and amnesty, the exchange of prisoners or the withdrawal of foreign troops.

But nothing new about weapons.

But none prohibits the sale of weapons

Of all these agreements, commonly known as the Minsk Protocol, none prohibits the sale or supply of arms to Ukraine from 2014. France has therefore not violated these agreements, contrary to the allegations shared on the social networks.

Perhaps these Internet users are confusing with the sale of advanced military equipment to Russia by France, despite a European embargo, from 2015 to 2020, revealed by an investigation by our colleagues from Disclose last March…

World

War in Ukraine: UN chief denounces “suicidal” attacks on nuclear sites

War in Ukraine: kyiv investigates 26,000 war crimes, 15 Ukrainians charged…

  • World

  • War in Ukraine

  • Russia

  • Minsk

  • Gabriel Attal

  • Weapons