The 46th Investigating Court of Madrid will investigate

the case of Silvia Idalia Serrano, the young woman who died this Saturday after spending months in an induced coma in the La Paz ICU after undergoing a triple cosmetic operation, as

reckless homicide

. passed away this Saturday.

Until now, Judge José María Escribano was investigating the

Ceme clinic

and two doctors from it for alleged reckless injuries in the intervention to which the

34-year-old girl

underwent and after which she went into an induced coma for several months.

The defense of the girl, exercised by Francesc Jufresa, has explained that after the death of the young woman, a forensic doctor from the court investigating the events will be requested to

intervene in

Silvia's autopsy to determine "if the direct cause of death is related to with the state" that led him to enter La Paz, explained the lawyer.

The young woman underwent several interventions on April 26 in the same operation carried out in one of the Ceme clinic centers.

The next day, she was discharged despite the severe pain she was suffering from and which, according to the clinic, was normal.

She was admitted to the La Paz Hospital on May 6 and since then she has been

in an induced coma in the ICU

.

The instruction is followed at the request of a complaint from the young woman's family, who understands that there was

negligence on the part of the

aesthetic center for not treating the severe pain that the girl suffered during the postoperative period.

The death of the young woman, her defense has explained,

"precipitates events"

because the Investigating Court number 46 of Madrid was investigating reckless injuries and will now continue to investigate the case for "reckless homicide."

During the process, the plastic surgeon who operated on the 34-year-old explained to the magistrate that the intervention

was "perfect"

and that Silvia "had nothing."

According to the judge, she does not know why she was "mysteriously" sent "to the La Paz Hospital.

The young woman's boyfriend, on the other hand, has pointed out that "a possible situation of abandonment in health care" occurred.

According to Daniel P., four days before her admission

, she suffered from sepsis symptoms

such as severe pain, colic, fever and dyspnea.

"Early detection of septicemia can save your life

and avoid the risk of death. I have informed myself now but doctors should know that. When he entered La Paz is when he is detected," he stressed.

Specifically, the young woman underwent a triple operation (breast reduction, liposuction and fat transfer to the buttocks) and

visited the emergency room three times

before notifying Samur, who finally transferred her to La Paz.

From Ceme they have regretted what happened.

"It was something fortuitous, a misfortune.

We are all dismayed,"

sources from the clinic told Europa Press.

In any case, they have argued that there has been no breach of the

lex artis

on quality levels required of professional services.

Thus, they have delivered an expert report to the court that rules out

malpractice

in Silvia's triple operation on April 29 and the postoperative process.

The report has been prepared by Dr. Francisco Javier Cobo Reinoso, specialist in Microbiology and Parasitology and Doctor of Medicine and Head of Section of the Infectious Diseases Service of the Ramón y Cajal Hospital in Madrid.

It states that "the patient has suffered an infectious complication called necrotizing fasciitis after plastic surgery procedures, but

exceptional."

"The bacteria involved in the necrotizing fasciitis suffered by the patient are not hospital-acquired or transmitted from personnel or the health environment, but rather from the patient's microbiota (flora)," the study points out.

The investigation has been extended to 19 other "quite similar" assumptions that, according to the young woman's lawyer, "prove the generalized nature, if not massive, of this malpractice that was carried out by CEME."

In this line, Silvia's defense asks the court to investigate the clinic because "it is not a simple isolated malpractice but an organization that has signs of being punishable."

Conforms to The Trust Project criteria

Know more