Al-Ain court ordered him to return 206 thousand dirhams

A representative embezzles 453 thousand dirhams .. the value of electricity bills

The court did not prove to it the defendant's acquittal of the amount received.

archival

A company accused its representative of embezzling 453,445 dirhams, which was received to pay the electricity bills of the company and its buildings, while the Al Ain Court of First Instance ruled to oblige the defendant to pay the company 205,983 dirhams.

In the details, a company filed a lawsuit against a representative working for it, asking him to oblige him to pay her an amount of 453 thousand and 445 dirhams, the value of the sums he seized unlawfully, explaining that she handed the representative the amounts under exchange bonds to pay the electricity fees on it and its properties, but he declined to She paid the electricity costs and embezzled the amount for himself without legal justification. She submitted a document for her claim, copies of exchange vouchers issued by the plaintiff, while the defendant submitted a memorandum on the lawsuit in which he denied the lawsuit and requested its refusal and, in precaution, refer the case for investigation.

The court stated in the merits of the ruling that what was proven from reading the exchange bonds issued by the plaintiff bearing two signatures, one from the accountant affiliated with the company, and the other from the recipient, which were not challenged by the defendant, is that the total amounts received are 205 thousand and 983 dirhams, and the evidence is from the statements The defendant, in the report of the delegated expert in the lawsuit, stated that he was receiving the amounts to pay the plaintiff’s electricity bills, as the company was assigning him to pay specific electricity bills, and after paying them, he would deliver the receipt to them and they were making sure of the account and that the bills were being paid online.

The court indicated that the defendant did not provide any receipt indicating the payment process and did not submit an account statement for the accounts from which the amount from which the bills were paid was deducted, whether the payment was made through a bank card or from a bank account or any other method, and then the fixed The court may concern the defendant with the amount received under the exchange vouchers bearing two signatures, amounting to 205,983 dirhams.

The court excluded the rest of the exchange bonds, which bear a similar signature in the accountant field, the recipient field, and the bonds that do not bear any signature, and the court did not prove to the court the defendant’s acquittal from the amount received, whether by submitting a payment receipt issued by the electricity company, or a receipt for depositing the amount for the value of electricity or He returned it to the plaintiff, and the court ruled obligating the defendant to pay the plaintiff an amount of 205,983 dirhams, fees, expenses, and attorney's fees.

Follow our latest local and sports news and the latest political and economic developments via Google news