China News Service, June 29th. Ma Xiaoguang, a spokesman for the Taiwan Affairs Office of the State Council, said at a regular press conference held by the Taiwan Affairs Office of the State Council on the 29th that Wu Zhaoxie and his like cooperated with external forces to hype hard, which was entirely based on the "Taiwan independence" separatist plot and harmed The common interests of compatriots on both sides of the strait are to betray the overall interests of the Chinese nation. This is something the 1.4 billion Chinese people will never agree to.

　　At the meeting, a reporter asked a question. Wu Zhaoxie claimed in an interview a few days ago that "China has never ruled Taiwan" and continued to spread the statement that "the two sides of the strait are not subordinate to each other". He also said that the United States and other countries sent warships through the Taiwan Strait to practice the so-called "freedom of navigation", showing that Attach importance to "regional peace and stability".

Comments on this?

　　In this regard, Ma Xiaoguang said that Wu Zhaoxie's fallacy, apart from once again exposing his divisive nature of selling the "two states theory" and colluding with external forces to seek "independence" and provocation, is untenable in legal theory and fact, let alone The so-called "cross-strait non-subordination" and "two-state theory" are absurd conclusions.

　　Ma Xiaoguang emphasized four points:

　　First, national sovereignty is indivisible.

Territory is the space in which states exercise their sovereignty.

On the territory of a country, there can only be one central government that exercises sovereignty on behalf of the country.

On October 1, 1949, the Central Government of the People's Republic of China replaced the Government of the Republic of China and became the sole legal government of the whole of China and the sole representative in international law.

This is the replacement of the old regime by the new regime under the condition that the same subject of international law has not changed.

China's sovereignty and inherent territory has not changed as a result.

The People's Republic of China rightfully enjoys the full exercise of China's sovereignty, including over Taiwan.

　　Second, although the two sides of the Taiwan Strait have not yet been unified, Taiwan's status as part of China's territory has never changed, and it is not allowed to change. China's sovereignty over Taiwan has never changed and cannot be changed.

The long-term existence of a state of civil war across the Taiwan Strait has not given Taiwan its status and rights in international law, nor can it change its legal status as a part of China.

　　Third, the international community recognizes that there is only one China in the world, Taiwan is a part of China, and the government of the People's Republic of China is the only legitimate government of China.

Under this principle, Taiwan has no right to participate in the United Nations and other international organizations that only sovereign states participate in. Countries that have established diplomatic relations with China cannot develop official relations with Taiwan, sell arms to Taiwan or engage in any form of military alliance with Taiwan.

The Chinese government treats Taiwan's foreign exchanges in accordance with the one-China principle, and protects all legitimate rights and interests of Taiwan compatriots overseas.

This is a concrete symbol of our sovereignty over Taiwan.

　　Fourth, China enjoys sovereignty, sovereign rights and jurisdiction over the Taiwan Strait, and at the same time respects the navigational rights enjoyed by other countries in accordance with international law, but firmly opposes any country that provokes and threatens China's sovereignty and security in the name of freedom of navigation.

The efforts of Wu Zhaoxie and others to cooperate with external forces to hype it up are based entirely on the "Taiwan independence" split plot, which harms the common interests of compatriots on both sides of the strait and betrays the overall interests of the Chinese nation. This is something that the 1.4 billion Chinese people will never agree to.