The Criminal Court convicted them of a fine and deportation

Two fraudsters seize 20 thousand dirhams from a young man with a fake contract

The Abu Dhabi Court obligated them to return the amount and 3000 dirhams in compensation.

archival

Two people defrauded a young man who was looking for a job, and they gave him a job opportunity in one of the companies, and they sent him a forged contract, and obtained from him about 20,000 dirhams in fees for ending the contract procedures. He has 22 thousand and 780 dirhams.

In the details, a young man filed a lawsuit against two people, requesting that they pay him 19,780 dirhams, which they obtained fraudulently, in addition to obligating them to pay a material and moral compensation of 20 thousand dirhams, and obligating them to pay fees and expenses, indicating that they sent him an email, which includes They provided him with a job in a company, and after that they sent him a work contract, asked him to sign it, and transfer funds to clear the contract procedures with the company, and accordingly transferred to them an amount of 19,780 dirhams in two payments, according to two transfers to the defendants, and they were convicted under a penal judgment They were fined 10,000 dirhams, deported from the state, and required judicial fees.

The court stated that it was evident from the papers that the mistake made by the defendants was to seize the plaintiff’s money, amounting to 19,780 dirhams, using fraudulent methods, and they were convicted according to a final judgment, pointing out that the act for which the defendants were convicted was to seize the money owned by the plaintiff. It is the same act on the basis of which the plaintiff relied in establishing his present case, and the penal judgment has been a necessary chapter in the occurrence of the act constituting the common basis between the criminal and civil suits, and in the legal description of this act and its attribution to its perpetrator.

Regarding the request for compensation in the amount of 20,000 dirhams, the court indicated that according to the Civil Transactions Law, every harm to others obliges the doer, even if he is not distinguished, to guarantee the damage, pointing out that if the defendants were proven wrong, there is an error necessitating the liability in their right, and the plaintiff has inflicted As a result of the appropriation of his money, damage is represented by what he missed of gain, and the loss that he suffered from not benefiting from the amount, as well as his feeling of sadness and sorrow after he was deceived by the existence of a job in one of the companies in the state.

The court ruled to compel the defendants jointly to pay the plaintiff an amount of 19,780 dirhams, and to compel them to jointly pay the plaintiff an amount of 3,000 dirhams as reparable compensation for the material and moral damages incurred by him, and to oblige them to pay fees and expenses.

Follow our latest local and sports news and the latest political and economic developments via Google news