China News Agency, Beijing, May 21 (Reporter Zhang Su) The half-year national special campaign to crack down on and rectify pension fraud has now turned to the key link of crackdown and rectification.

The Supreme People's Court of China made another deployment, aiming to quickly launch a powerful offensive to crack down on crimes.

  The reporter learned from the Supreme People's Court on the 21st that the promotion meeting of the National Court's special action to crack down on pension fraud has further clarified the phased goals and tasks.

At the meeting, it was stated that the court would target the attack on providing "elderly care services", investing in "elderly care projects", selling "elderly care products", claiming "house-for-age care", acting as "endowment insurance", and carrying out "endowment assistance", etc. In the name of various types of fraud and crimes that infringe upon the legitimate rights and interests of the elderly.

  The Supreme Law requires that a number of cases with great social impact and high public attention should be tried and sentenced as soon as possible, so as to form a strong crackdown and resolutely curb the spread of pension fraud crimes.

  Zhou Qiang, President of the Supreme People's Court of China, also stated that it is necessary to increase the application of property penalties such as fines and confiscation of property in accordance with the law, and to carry out the fight against gangsters and evils in a normalized manner. .

  At the same time, the Supreme Law requires that the facts, evidence, procedure and application of the law should be strictly controlled, and it is strictly forbidden to artificially "raise heights" and "make up the numbers."

It is known that relevant departments will promptly improve relevant judicial interpretations, issue judicial policies and guiding opinions, release a batch of typical cases in due course, and resolutely prevent economic disputes from being treated as economic crimes and civil cases as criminal cases.

  The Supreme People's Court proposed that the recovery of stolen goods should be regarded as an important criterion for testing the effectiveness of special actions, and it was clarified that "the property enforcement of pension fraud cases should be regarded as an important task, and there should be a joint implementation" and "we will make every effort to do a good job in the property management of major pension fraud cases involving stakeholders". Implement work, implement one case, one policy, and one case and one special class.”

(Finish)

Keywords: