The Justice increases the compensation to Antonio David for invalid dismissal and dismisses the appeal of La Fábrica de la Tele

• Television Antonio David, after his victory against Save me for his 'parallel trial': "This is the first blow, many more will come"

• Triumph Politicizing the 'Rociíto case' made Olga Moreno the winner

• Surprise Antonio David breaks into the Mediaset board as a shareholder and attacks Telecinco and La Fábrica de la Tele after his dismissal last year

A year after its broadcast, the

, is still just as critical.

And even though the scenario is different in many aspects.

Eight months after the Social Court number 42 of Madrid declared the

of Antonio David Flores "null for violation of his right to honour" -the day after the docuseries of his ex-wife,

, premiered- , the Court Superior Court of Justice of Madrid (TSJM)

filed by La Fábrica de la Tele and estimates, "in part, the appeal filed by the procedural representation of Mr. Antonio David Flores Carrasco, for the sole purpose of

for non-pecuniary damage amounting to

according to the sentence dated April 29, which LOC has been able to access.

EL MUNDO already had access to the full sentence of the Social Court number 42 of Madrid which, dated September 20, decreed that "the dismissal of the worker is null for

condemning the defendant [the production company La Fábrica de la Tele] to the payment of wages not received until the date on which the temporary contract had ended -32,361 euros- (...) as well as additional

for damages caused by the violation of his right to honor in the amount of 50,000 euros".

Antonio David, on the set of Save me. TELECINCO

Rocío Carrasco's statements in the docuseries, in which she accused Antonio David Flores of

then caused a tsunami in the world of the heart that even politics jumped into the ring.

Irene Montero, celebrated the broadcast of the program on her Twitter account while the program was still broadcasting, to name just one example.

Now, "the company La Fábrica de la Tele is condemned to pay an additional compensation of 50,000 euros" and

on what a year ago obtained the media, social and political focus of an entire country.

"Here the 'exceptio veritatis' cannot be applied," says the ruling.

[The defendant for the crime of slander will be exempt from any penalty by proving the criminal act that he has imputed].

And it goes on to describe: "Live in an

with strong media coverage and on social networks, since it is clear that a series of factual and non-factual circumstances have been communicated,

or with manifest contempt for the veracity of the news, substituting an objective truth, empirically verifiable, for

To the collaborators of the program who commented between episodes, Justice says: "The communication medium and the presenters and collaborators of the program are

Since what was communicated is not supported, therefore, in truthful information, but rather in the subjective, partial and self-interested account of Ms. Rocío Carrasco Mohedano, taking into account

brought at the request of Ms. Rocío Carrasco Mohedano against Mr. Antonio David Flores Carrasco (Proven Fact Thirteenth),

and immediately confronted with the preservation of the right to honor of the person to whom the content of the communication refers and thus, the repercussion of the statements subject to examination on the right to honor and reputation of Mr. Antonio David Flores Carrasco It cannot be denied, especially since it is stated in the proceedings that

or

on television.

Conforms to The Trust Project criteria

Know more

• Rocio Carrasco

• Anthony David Flores