The accused denied before the court .. And his defense denied the presence of premeditation and premeditation

Dubai Criminal Court issues its ruling to execute the killer of a businessman and his wife

The Dubai Criminal Court issued the death sentence against an Asian dyer, who was convicted of killing an Asian businessman and his wife and attempting to kill his daughter.

 The death sentence was unanimously adopted by the court, and it was issued on April 20.

The rationale stated that the accused denied before the court the accusation, despite his confession to committing it in detail in the police evidence report and the investigations of the Public Prosecution in Dubai.

The court defended the invalidity of the confession claiming that it was the result of moral coercion, explaining that confession in criminal matters is an element of inference that the court has complete freedom to assess its validity, stressing that the case papers are completely void of what supports the defense of coercion, and that it reassures that the confession of the accused in The prosecution's investigations were released voluntarily and by choice.

The accused admitted in the investigations of the prosecution that he bought the knife from a store near his residence in another emirate, then asked someone to deliver it to the location of the villa, on June 17, 2020, and it remained dormant until eleven o’clock in the evening, then jumped off the fence and hid in the inner garden Until one in the morning, he entered through a side door on the ground floor, searched for items to be stolen, and found the victim's wallet and seized the money inside.

The accused added that he went upstairs to the room of the victim and his wife, as he had seen money in it earlier when he came to work in the villa months before planning the crime, pointing out that he opened one of the drawers in a table next to the bed on the side of the husband, so he woke up and caught him, but the accused He took out the knife and stabbed him in separate places on his body, and the wife woke up and attacked her and there was a stampede between them and he grabbed her hand and stabbed her twice in the neck and one stab in the chest.

In response to the lack of intention to kill, the court stated that the intent in premeditated crimes is a hidden matter that is not aware of the apparent sense, but is inferred by the surrounding circumstances in the case, noting that it is established by it according to his confession that he had previously worked in the victim’s villa, and a witness had sums a lot.

Three days before the incident, the idea dominated his conscience, and he resolved to kill him and the people of his house, if circumstances led them in front of him while carrying out his criminal scheme by stealing the villa while they were sleeping, and he prepared for that a knife that he bought of his free will, and he remained lurking near the house until the evening, lurking behind the trees, and then Infiltrated and during the theft, the husband woke up and killed him with his severe weapon stabs and then killed his wife, and did not leave them until after confirming their death, then the third victim saw the "daughter", so he proceeded to kill her, but the effect of his crime was disappointed by her undergoing rapid treatment, and these are the circumstances that the court sees together confirms The presence of the accused's intent to kill.

Regarding the argument that premeditated and premeditated circumstances were not available, the court clarified in its rationale that the lesson of premeditation is the determined intent to commit a crime, and that the offender thought about what he intended to do and manage its consequences while he is calm of mind, while surveillance is the monitoring of the victim for a period of time. and stalking it.

And she indicated that it was established by the court that he managed the matter before he committed the incident calmly and deliberately for three days prior to the date of the execution of the crime, and bought the knife, then lurked in the place and infiltrated the villa, and other details referred to in advance in his confession, all of which are circumstances cut off by the availability of a previous circumstantial Persistence and surveillance are taken by the court.

Follow our latest local and sports news and the latest political and economic developments via Google news