Forensic lab report revealed

A merchant submits to the court a clearance with a forged signature and a valid fingerprint

Al-Ain Court transferred the discharge to the Public Prosecution.

archival

Al-Ain Court of First Instance decided to transfer the papers of the discharge case to the Public Prosecution, after it was proven that the signature contained in the declaration of discharge attributed to the defendant had been forged. The court also decided to prove the validity of the defendant’s fingerprint on the statement.

In the details, a merchant filed a lawsuit against an investor, in which he demanded a ruling to prove the validity of his signature on the discharge declaration, noting that he has had various transactions with the investor for long periods, and obtained from him checks, trust receipts and indebtedness bonds whose number and amounts specified in them are unknown, and on January 20 2020 obtained from him a discharge and a waiver of any sums of money claimed by him, which is the acknowledgment of the case document under the signature and fingerprint of the investor, then he was surprised by his moving several communications to demand checks in his possession, and he moved a number of cases to claim those amounts, and submitted a photocopy of the evidence for his claim of the acknowledgment in question And a copy of his translation.While the defendant’s defense submitted a memorandum insisting on appealing the forgery of the signature and fingerprint on the document in question attributed to the defendant, and requested the assignment of the forensic laboratory to review the origin of this document to examine the signature and handprint attributed to him, to indicate whether he (the defendant) wrote the data And the signature and imprint of this editor or not.

The forensic laboratory report showed that the defendant did not sign the acknowledgment document, the signature was forged by imitation, and the imprint on the original document under examination fully applied to the fingerprint of the defendant's left thumb.

In the ruling, the court stated that the evidence from the laboratory report that it performed the matching according to the technical bases, and concluded that the fingerprint on the acknowledgment fully matches the fingerprint of the defendant’s left thumb, and that the document under examination does not have any technical manifestations that indicate that it was forged or counterfeiting, the matter from which the court concludes that the defendant is the one who stamped the statement in question, and the latter’s assertion that the fingerprint does not have the technical marks necessary for comparison, as well as that it was taken inadvertently or unintentionally, and that it was taken inadvertently or unintentionally, is not affected by this. It was embezzled from the defendant, as the latter did not prove the validity of what he claimed.

Regarding the request to prove the authenticity of the signature, the court indicated that the evidence from the report of the forensic laboratory delegated in the case, which the court reassures of the adequacy of the research conducted and the soundness of the foundations on which it was built, is that the signature contained in the statement in the case is forged, and is not attributed to the defendant, as it is with him. The case, in its part related to proving the authenticity of the signature, has lost its basis, and what the plaintiff’s attorney insisted on requesting the referral of the case for investigation and hearing witnesses, in order to prove that the defendant signed the acknowledgment of his own free will.

The court decided to establish the validity of the defendant’s fingerprint on the acknowledgment subject of the lawsuit, and to reserve the acknowledgment subject of the lawsuit in which the signature forgery was proven, and to send a copy of the minutes related to the forgery to the Public Prosecution to take its criminal procedures in this regard, after this judgment becomes final, either by the lapse of the appeal deadlines Or a final decision on the appeal.

Follow our latest local and sports news and the latest political and economic developments via Google news