Acquitted a businessman accused of raping a 'sugar baby' after drugging her during a threesome

A wealthy 47-year-old businessman has been acquitted by a Majadahonda judge after being accused of

attractive young woman who has a relationship with an older person in exchange for gifts

, during a threesome in a party held in a chalet in the west of the region at the end of last year.

The judge who filed the complaint does not give credibility to the young woman's testimony and maintains that there are numerous inconsistencies in her account.

The defendant

who told him that she was actually a

and that she could meet him whenever they wanted in exchange for luxurious gifts such as Louis Vuitton bags or Dior necklaces.

The man accepted and they started having sex.

This woman told him that she knew another

that she wanted to see.

The businessman accepted and organized a barbecue in his chalet to meet his friend.

At the party the second girl pointed out to the first that she had liked the businessman and that she wanted him to support her as well.

That night a threesome began between the defendant and the two women.

The main

clarified that

However, the friend goes ahead with the sexual relationship and faced with this situation, the first one, angry, left.

The businessman ran after her and asked her to come back.

This she demanded that he throw out the second

.

The man did and sent her into another room.

The next morning the guest exposed her discomfort to her friend and she left the house and two days later she reported that she had been raped at the party by the businessman after being drugged.

The victim had also tested positive for Benzodiazepines.

The lawyer Beatriz Uriarte, an expert in gender violence and sexual crimes at the head of the criminal procedure area in the

defended the businessman.

The case fell to the Investigating Court number 8 of Majadahonda.

consensual relationships

Uriarte maintained from the beginning that the sexual relations were fully consensual and that no one drugged the complainant, providing transcripts of various WhatsApp conversations, which revealed, among other extremes,

and having a good time, even planning to "...fuck him or have a threesome with us."

The messages were ratified in her statement by one of those involved, indicating that "the three went up to a bedroom, lay down on the bed, and the three began to have consensual sexual relations."

The witness added that "at no time was her friend sexually assaulted, that

the complainant leaving by herself to another room when she considered that those limits were crossed and her friend had a complete sexual relationship with the investigated.

But in addition, the criminal lawyer reeled off

in which the presence in the complainant's blood of Lamotrigine, a drug used for epilepsy and bipolar disorder, pathologies suffered by the victim, Clobazam , from the group of benzodiazepines, indicated for the treatment of anxiety and coadjuvant of epilepsy, naproxneo, an anti-inflammatory, and finally pseudoephedrine, with decongestant properties for nasal congestion and rhinitis.

The defense was able to demonstrate "that it was

, and in no case any other substance that the investigated party could have used to obtain the consent of the victim at the time of being able to have non-consensual sexual relations with her," according to the filing order.

The judge in charge of the case, assessing all the circumstances and peripheral elements surrounding the facts, stated that she was faced with a case of contradictory versions in which "

, main or peripheral, direct or indirect, or even circumstantial of the version of the facts offered by the complainant, about alleged sexual relations without consent, induced by an alleged consumption of toxins, "according to the order.

The magistrate adds that if the account of the accused supported by the witnesses has consistency, especially that of the woman who witnessed the sexual relations directly and in person, "who stated that the complainant gave her consent to them at all times, and did not I was neither drugged nor dizzy when the events occurred.

The order adduces these reasons to agree to the file and dismissal of the proceedings, describing that "

, and in short, the concurrence of the objective and subjective elements required to be in the presence of a crime of sexual abuse without consent between adults is not appreciated". Finally, the magistrate points out that "we can even find ourselves in the presence of a spurious spirit in the initial complaint, given that from

in relation to the

provided in the complaint itself, elements are inferred that cast doubt on the absence of subjective incredibility in the initial testimony of the complainant". The businessman is now studying the possibility of denouncing the young woman for false testimony.

Conforms to The Trust Project criteria

Know more