There is no way to persuade a person to leave his home, in which he lived hundreds or thousands of years ago, in favor of another occupier, except for weapons. The original country was sacrificed to their Zionist dream, because only blood can achieve their goal.

The massacres of the Zionist gangs against the Palestinian people began a decade or more before the declaration of the establishment of the Israeli occupation state. Then the ferocity of these crimes increased with the approaching announcement of the birth of the occupying country. In the year 1948 alone, the Zionist gangs carried out 37 massacres to force the owners of the land to leave.

After the emergence of the first core of this state imposed on the region, the members of the Haganah, Stern, Irgun and Palmach gangs began preparing for a new phase of the conflict, as some of them took off their military uniforms stained with blood and dressed in civilian clothes that showed them the appearance of a statesman.

Over the following years and decades, the occupying power continued its attempt to exterminate the Palestinian people, but the genocide took other forms.

It is true that the military and security part has remained strongly present in a state that is trying in vain to assert its legitimacy, but another equally important part has emerged in parallel with all this, and this time it is related to trying to persuade the Palestinians to accept the policy of the fait accompli, and even an attempt to “Judaize” and “islandize” some of those who remained Inside the occupied territories in 1948.

Bullets and "absorption"... a weapon of extermination

The percentage of lands subject to Jews when the occupation state was established did not exceed 10% of the total lands of Palestine, and with the passage of time, Israel continued to annex Arab lands until it controlled about 90% of the Palestinian lands during the Mandate period. This was of course only done through a campaign of ethnic cleansing. It displaced about 800,000 Palestinians and destroyed 531 Palestinian towns and villages.

Despite the genocide and ethnic cleansing carried out by the Zionist gangs, a part of the Palestinians kept some of their land occupied in 1948, and this category was called “the Arabs of 48” or “the Palestinians of the Interior”, while the occupying state is trying to market them as “Israel’s Arabs” who They live alongside the Jewish majority.

In order to reach this impossible equation of impossible harmony, Israel has adopted the policies of "familyization" by which it changes the national identity of the remaining Arabs into an Israeli one, and this process, which began decades ago, is taking place through a number of racist policies aimed primarily at restricting the "Arabs of the interior." In order to force them to surrender to the fait accompli and bow down politically, economically and socially to the Israeli identity at the expense of their Arab nationalism.

However, the Palestinians' adherence to their nationalism at the expense of the Israeli identity, and Israel's failure to integrate them into a state that only recognizes Jewish identity and excludes other identities and beliefs, made them a minority living on the margins of Israeli society.

The ferocity of the racist laws increased after the rise of the Israeli right to power. The period of Benjamin Netanyahu witnessed tightening the noose on the Palestinians of the occupied interior, as the occupation government worked to make the Arab regions an incubator for a distorted social environment that attracts violence.

In addition to the societal restriction, Israel has further asserted its Jewish identity, stressing that the religious, cultural and linguistic inheritance of the occupying power does not depart from the heritage of the Jews. From this heritage, the founders were inspired by the flag, the national anthem, and the menorah as the emblem of this state.

These laws have led to more discrimination towards the Arabs of the interior, who are perceived at best as second-class citizens, or an internal enemy that poses a real threat to Israeli national security.

The direct targeting came through a number of racist laws, such as the "National Law", which stipulates the Jewishness of the state, and the "Kaminitz" law, which facilitates the procedures for demolishing the homes of Palestinians inside.

The occupying power established a policy of "familyization" based on a number of basic axes, starting with education, ending with the economy, and passing through demographic displacement.

Israel attaches great importance to the educational and educational Judaization policy, and through it it is trying to change the educational, intellectual and social structure of Arab students living in the occupied Palestinian interior, and the goal is simply to push these students to repudiate their Arab and Palestinian identity, and this is done through the Arabization of Hebrew curricula filled with Zionist propaganda, Which does not address the Palestinian issue in any way, but rather focuses on the establishment of Israel, its men, its goals, and its religious, geographic, cultural and social foundations.

Through these steps, the occupation government aimed to prevent the Palestinians from forming their independent identity, which means that they are internally crushed and unable to organize themselves in order to protest in order to obtain their natural right to their nation-state.

At the level of the economy, Israel works through its policies in this regard to support the consumer culture among the Arab society, due to the ability of this culture to distract people from their social, political and cultural life, and the focus on the daily consumption aspect makes the internal Palestinian society a fragmented structure in which violence and crime spread, The danger of these policies lies in the occupation government’s complete control over this economic model, as independence in such a social fabric becomes almost impossible in light of Israel’s monopoly over the process of drawing up economic relations with its Jewish citizens and with Arab minorities alike.

And because all these policies have not made the “48 Arabs” so far a homogeneous social segment with Israeli society, the occupation government is relying on the policy of “silent displacement”, by enacting many racist laws, while destroying the internal Arab social structure in order to push the Palestinians to leave Their lands that they kept after the occupation, flee in search of a better life elsewhere.

Israel has worked to divide Arab residential areas in order to break up Arab society, and it has also endeavored to deepen the differences between the various segments of this same Palestinian bloc by isolating Muslims, Christians, and Druze from each other, and then limiting their contact with each other for fear of their agreement on national premises that would push them to demand their rights nationalism.

The Israelization of Jerusalem.. the far bet

The arrows of the family were not directed only towards the inner cities, but also bypassed them to occupied Jerusalem itself.

The Netanyahu government has worked in full swing during the administration of Donald Trump to extract maximum political gains, the most important of which is Washington's recognition of Jerusalem as the capital of Israel.

And the Israeli government's efforts were not disappointed, as the former US president announced in December that work had begun to move his country's embassy to Jerusalem, instead of actually Tel Aviv.

For years, Israel aspired to Judaize Jerusalem and remove any presence of any other religions on the Holy Land. Therefore, it worked diligently to support settlements, link settlement projects with each other, and penetrate the social and political orbit surrounding the Holy Land.

In recent years, the occupying power, with its various political currents from left to right, has been targeting the identity of the Palestinian Jerusalemite community by luring the city’s residents to join the civil rights system, which has clearly not achieved any benefit for the Arabs of 48. The Israeli media have greatly celebrated the list. The Palestinian woman who wanted to run in the 2018 municipal elections in Jerusalem, before Aziz Abu Sarah, the leader of the list, was forced to withdraw after pressure from the people.

Despite the great confusion caused by the news of Abu Sarah's candidacy for the elections and his subsequent withdrawal, Israeli liberal circles considered the step in itself important.

In the field of education, in mid-2018, the Israeli government allocated about two billion shekels (about $620 million) to fund a five-year plan in Jerusalem aimed at supporting the family through education, as the occupying state is trying not to “lose future generations,” and the plan focuses on tempting the children of Jerusalemites to study the Israeli curricula instead of the Palestinian.

The occupation authorities have allocated about 57 million shekels (about $17.7 million) to develop and restore Israeli schools, and 67 million shekels to rent and build other schools, while about 17 million shekels ($20.8 million) will be allocated to support Hebrew education.

Funding for education will be limited to the Israeli-Hebrew side, as the Israeli Ministry of Education has confirmed that it does not fund any institution that does not adopt the Israeli education system.

This change in Israeli philosophy comes after the occupation government realized that education - and not security alone - is what can help it to settle the matter for it, which was confirmed by "Nir Hasson", a political analyst for the newspaper "Haaretz" for Jerusalem affairs, where he said that Israel will continue to support Familyization is strong, but in education this time, after the failure of the 2014 security plan, which may be more effective, as the educational system includes many sensitive points of contention between the Palestinian and Israeli narratives, such as security, the state, borders and the historical narrative.

The family program did not stop at education, of course, but rather transcended it to other previous parallel steps, such as withdrawing Israeli identities from Arabs in Jerusalem to reduce the percentage of Palestinians in the city, in addition to the issuance of the Organizing and Planning Law that sets impossible conditions for Palestinians in the areas of licensing and construction, in addition to Judaizing The names of the Israeli sites and the obliteration of the Palestinian cities through their “Hebronization.” The Israeli government has “Hebraised” about 7,000 Palestinian sites and more than 1,000 settlements.

Very limited results

It is true that the Israeli occupation authorities have been imposing “familyization” in many areas, but the results of these policies so far remain limited. Indeed, their failure recently prompted Israel to invoke its old model again to resolve crises, which is pure security dealing through the stick of Zionist gangs.

The "Palestinians of 48" have been present in many important and pivotal events that the country has witnessed since the beginning of the occupation. They participated in Land Day in 1976, and proved their presence in the First Intifada in 1987, then Al-Aqsa Intifada in 2000, and then Jerusalem Intifada between 2015-2017, By proving that they are a real and indivisible force within the fabric of the Palestinian people, whether in the West Bank, in Gaza, or in the diaspora, despite their exclusion from the agreements signed by the occupying power with the Palestine Liberation Organization.

Then came the happy surprise of the Palestinian people in the confrontations of last Ramadan, when the crisis of the Sheikh Jarrah neighborhood ignited the confrontations with the occupation forces again, and soon these confrontations moved to Gaza, and from there to the occupied Palestinian interior, as the demonstrations started, especially after the occupation forces’ suppression of the residents of Jerusalem in The Night of Power.

Contrary to what was expected, the movement of Palestinian youth inside reflected a tight organization of the popular movement, as social networking sites played a major role in the organizational aspect, and the protesters crossed the Israeli red lines that traditional politicians usually do not cross.

This "gift" was distinguished from others by its duration of up to three weeks, which created a kind of fear inside Israel. It did not delay in asking for a helping hand from the settlers, who came from different areas to suppress the movement with blood and borders this time.

Some sources revealed that the Israeli forces provided the settlers with maps and information indicating Arab homes in order to target them and attack their residents. settler gangs.

These confrontations prompted the Israeli government to try to stop the war on Gaza for fear of losing control of the occupied interior, which continued to simmer with each attack or new confrontations between settlers and the Arab population. Immediately after the end of the aggression, the Israeli police unleashed an extensive campaign of arrests that targeted the young men who participated in Demonstrations.

The movement of Palestinians inside the country confirms the ineffectiveness of the policies of "familyization." A report published by the "Morocco Rishon" newspaper, which is considered the mouthpiece of the religious Zionist settlement movement, considered that the Israeli government failed to Judaize the Galilee region, which lost a large percentage of the Jews, making it a majority area. Arab, due to the failure of the occupation authorities to establish an attractive economic structure that encourages Jewish youth to stay in the region.

The newspaper also accused the government of lacking clear and effective plans to reduce the proportion of Arabs and increase the proportion of Jews.

This Israeli failure to Judaize the Galilee and other areas, according to what the newspaper "Haaretz" reported, lies in the contradictions of the Israeli policy that tried to market "family" to the Palestinians as if it was selling air to them, since its internal policies basically contradict the reality of the rejection of the other inside Israel itself. A non-Jew, even when he accepts the conditions imposed on him and swallows the undisguised policy of "familyization".

The result in the end is that the "Israeli Arab" receives half the wages of a Jew, and lives in isolated neighborhoods dominated by crime and violence and lacking personal security.

Even if he accepts all this, he will come out with the nation-state law reminding him that he is not a Jew, and that none of his first-class citizens (Jews) really desires his existence.

Perhaps the recent operations in the interior regions have shattered certainty about the issue of the “Judaization and family” project.