On the 15th, the company asked the court to injunction again because the company rejected the immediate appeal against the decision of the Korean court to allow the sale of Mitsubishi Heavy Industries' assets due to the issue of "recruitment" during the Pacific War. "Appeal" was made.
In 2018, the Supreme Court of South Korea handed down a ruling ordering Mitsubishi Heavy Industries to compensate Korean women who allegedly had to work hard during the war as a "women's working corps."
After that, in response to the plaintiff's petition, Mitsubishi Heavy Industries' patent and trademark rights in South Korea were seized, and the district court in South Korea issued a decision in September last year to allow the sale of assets.
The company immediately appealed this as a complaint, but it was rejected by February, and the court took the procedure of "public notice delivery" which is considered to have arrived at the company by posting the decision document on the homepage. I did.
Regarding patent rights, the "service of public notice" came into effect on the 12th of this month, and Mitsubishi Heavy Industries filed a "re-appeal" to seek an injunction against the decision again yesterday.
Mitsubishi Heavy Industries commented, "I understand that the Japan-Korea Claims Agreement has been'completely and finally settled'and I can no longer make any claims. I have re-appealed based on the current state of exchanges between governments."
The Japanese government has settled the issue of "recruitment" based on the 1965 Japan-Korea Claims Agreement, and has violated the Korean government, saying that the ruling that ordered Japanese companies to compensate and the related judicial proceedings violated international law. I am seeking a correction.