A vehicle tire causes a compensation case of 150 thousand dirhams

The Abu Dhabi Family Court and Civil and Administrative Claims rejected a compensation claim brought by a vehicle owner against a car company, in which he demanded that it pay him an amount of 150,000 dirhams in compensation for the material and moral damages he sustained as a result of a crash resulting from the company installing a tire for his vehicle with a bearing force less than Required.

In the details, a man filed a lawsuit against a car company, at the end of which he requested to oblige it to pay him 120 thousand and 544 dirhams as material compensation and an amount of 30 thousand dirhams as moral and moral compensation, with obligating it to pay fees and expenses and in return for attorney fees, indicating that he bought tires His vehicle had a two-year warranty from the defendant company, and it was found that the front tire was damaged on the right, so he went to the defendant, which is located in the Musaffah Industrial Area. Indeed, the tire was replaced, but with less bearing force, which led to its explosion when he was driving the vehicle on his way back. The vehicle was involved in a traffic accident as a result of the sudden swerving and hitting the concrete barrier, which caused him material and moral damage as a result of that traffic accident.

In support of his claim, the plaintiff submitted, in support of his claim, photocopies of a traffic accident plan from Saed Traffic Systems, a tire insurance certificate, vehicle ownership, and photos of the vehicle in the event of the accident and the damage it sustained, in addition to an invoice issued by the defendant with the value of the funds for repairing the vehicle, while the plaintiff submitted It has a reply memorandum requesting the rejection of the case and obligating the plaintiff to pay fees and expenses and in return for attorney's fees.

 For its part, the court clarified that it is decided according to the Civil Transactions Law that the origin is clear, and it is decided from the Evidence Law that the plaintiff must prove his right and the defendant has the right to deny it, noting that what is proven in the attached papers, including an accident plan issued by Saed Traffic Systems Company, which proved The plaintiff had a traffic accident while he was driving the vehicle along Hazaa Street towards Al Reem before the first sign to enter the island. The reason for this was a sudden deviation from his route that hit a concrete barrier. However, that report did not show that the cause of the accident was the explosion of one of the vehicle’s tires.

The court indicated that it did not conclude that there was an error that had been issued by the defendant, and the statements of the plaintiff were sent without evidence or presumption to support what he claimed, pointing out that with the absence of the element of the error, all the elements of the tort responsibility requiring compensation collapse, which is with which the lawsuit came without a basis from the Reality and law, and the court ruled to reject the case in its case and obligate the plaintiff to pay fees and expenses.

Follow our latest local and sports news and the latest political and economic developments via Google news