<Anchor>



Let's talk a little more with reporter Kang Cheong-wan from the Political Department.



Q. Clash again after three days of dinner meeting...

What is the background?



[Reporter Kang Cheong-wan: The takeover committee is officially in the position to look at the facts as they are, not political interpretations.

The argument is that it is common sense to appoint an alumnus of the president's younger brother at the end of the regime as the president of an insolvent public company that costs trillions of dollars.

At the same time, he pointed to the Blue House as the background, saying that he had raised suspicions that there was actually a separate appointing authority.

The Blue House did not hide its displeasure by accepting this passage as it was an expression that inevitably entailed political interpretation.

The two sides had a big clash over the current government's personnel rights, and then finally took the steps to close it at a dinner meeting.

There is no clear progress in the practical consultations for the relocation of the office, the first pledge of the elected president.

We are nervous as we continue to doubt each other's intentions, but the conflict is likely to continue unless the trust issue is resolved.]



Q. Expanding the front line to other points?



[Reporter Kang Cheong-wan: It's also a personnel right issue, but the Democratic Party criticized today (31st) whether it was collecting blacklist data when Rep. Lee Dal-gon, the People's Power, asked to submit a list of appointments and careers under the Ministry of Health and Welfare.

In addition, there was a sharp reaction from the Democratic Party of Korea as to whether it would retaliate politically for the fact that the transition committee sent out an official letter to each ministry not to destroy documents made by the current government.

Regarding the controversy over Kim Jung-sook's costume cost, the front lines are scattered, such as criticism from the opposition and rebuttals from the passport.]



Q. Will the 'new and old power conflict' continue?

the outlook?



[Reporter Kang Cheong-wan: I mentioned earlier that it is a trust issue, but looking at the current of the transition committee, I can read the thought that the Yoon Seok-yeol government will take a proper hand in 40 days without saying anything sorry to the current government.

There seems to be an aspect that expects the public opinion to be strengthened by the current government as a hindrance.

On the other hand, the Blue House and the passport have a strong perception that the transition committee is acting like an occupation force and trying to establish a confrontational angle with the Blue House and the current government in every case.

Even in today's appointment of the president of Daewoo Shipbuilding & Marine Engineering, it is said that the Blue House and the President were pressed against the President with the expression of ignorance and absurdity in the realm of assumptions, not facts.

The conflict between the two sides, as an extension of the presidential election and a prelude to the June local elections, is not an exaggerated interpretation.]



(Video editing: Choi Jin-hwa)



▶ "The President's 'Rubbakgi'"...

"Is the commissioner looking at the place?"


▶ 4 years new promotion 'repeat'...

"Through an objective process"