During the night of Wednesday to Thursday Russia launched a massive and rapid attack against Ukraine, bombarding several major cities.
Since then, the fighting has not stopped with, on the Ukrainian side, at least 198 civilians, including three children, killed and 1,115 people injured.
This Sunday, Vladimir Putin asked his ministers to put the Russian army's deterrent forces on special combat alert... A new level reached in the nuclear threat?
“I order the Minister of Defense and the Chief of Staff to put the deterrent forces of the Russian army on special combat alert,” Vladimir Putin ordered this Sunday during a interview with its military leaders broadcast on television.
"It's understood," replied the Minister of Defense, Sergei Shoigu.
This Sunday afternoon, on the fourth day of fighting in Ukraine, this order from Vladimir Putin, which he justifies, justified as a response to "belligerent declarations by NATO" and to economic sanctions against Russia, created a new international shock wave.
“This is dangerous rhetoric.
It is behavior that is irresponsible,” declared Norwegian Jens Stoltenberg, Secretary General of NATO.
Jean-Marie Collin, expert in nuclear disarmament, spokesperson for ICAN-France, (French section of the international campaign to abolish nuclear weapons, deciphers for
20 minutes
this new escalation of tensions.
By the deterrent force of the Russian army, should we clearly understand “nuclear deterrence”?
There is no doubt yes.
These deterrent forces of the Russian army evoked by Vladimir Putin are indeed all the nuclear weapons devices that Russia possesses.
On the offensive level, they include missiles on the ground, strategic bombers, nuclear-powered ballistic missile submarines, surface ships... Today, President Putin has the first nuclear arsenal in the world with a little more than 6,000 warheads, including 1,600 which are already deployed, that is to say can be used quickly and with the ability to reach any corner of the globe thanks to its nuclear submarines.
Knowing that a small percentage of this nuclear arsenal in the hands of Putin would be enough to change life on Earth.
We easily have in mind the images of the atomic bombings of the Japanese cities of Hiroshima and Nagasaki in Japan, in 1945… Are nuclear weapons in the hands of States much more powerful today?
Yes very clearly.
Depending on the weapon systems, we are talking about powers multiplied by four, ten, or even 25 for certain weapons in the hands of Russia.
But it's not all about power.
Today, nuclear weapons are intended to strike military and civilian infrastructure, mainly in cities.
However, in all of these or at least near them, there is today a set of fragile infrastructures that did not exist in Japan in 1945. Nuclear power plants, oil or chemical sites classified as Seveso [industrial sites with major accident risks].
That's also what you have to keep in mind when talking about a nuclear threat: this potential chain of disasters.
And if Putin is targeting Europe and North America this Sunday,
it must be clearly understood that any nuclear attack would have consequences, in one way or another, on all the countries of the planet.
Whether through influxes of refugees, disruptions in nuclear supply but also even, in the event of several attacks and responses, the possible occurrence of a nuclear winter*.
In describing this, I am not falling into catastrophism, these are elements that have been repeated over the past fifteen years by the International Committee of the Red Cross, by the UN, or during conferences on the humanitarian impact of nuclear weapons. .
The countries that have these nuclear weapons are aware of these risks and have been playing with fire for years.
Whether through influxes of refugees, disruptions in nuclear supply but also even, in the event of several attacks and responses, the possible occurrence of a nuclear winter*.
In describing this, I am not falling into catastrophism, these are elements that have been repeated over the past fifteen years by the International Committee of the Red Cross, by the UN, or during conferences on the humanitarian impact of nuclear weapons. .
The countries that have these nuclear weapons are aware of these risks and have been playing with fire for years.
Whether through influxes of refugees, disruptions in nuclear supply but also even, in the event of several attacks and responses, the possible occurrence of a nuclear winter*.
In describing this, I am not falling into catastrophism, these are elements that have been repeated over the past fifteen years by the International Committee of the Red Cross, by the UN, or during conferences on the humanitarian impact of nuclear weapons. .
The countries that have these nuclear weapons are aware of these risks and have been playing with fire for years.
these are elements that have been repeated over the past fifteen years by the International Committee of the Red Cross, by the UN, or during conferences on the humanitarian impact of nuclear weapons.
The countries that have these nuclear weapons are aware of these risks and have been playing with fire for years.
these are elements that have been repeated over the past fifteen years by the International Committee of the Red Cross, by the UN, or during conferences on the humanitarian impact of nuclear weapons.
The countries that have these nuclear weapons are aware of these risks and have been playing with fire for years.
Since the Cuban Missile Crisis [October 14-28, 1962], is this the first time the nuclear threat has been agitated with such force?
Indeed, there was this Cuban missile crisis which, for fifteen days, brought us extremely close to the use of nuclear arsenals.
Especially when on October 27, in the midst of a crisis, an American plane was shot down over Cuba during a reconnaissance mission.
We are today in an equally tense context which did not begin this Sunday with this order from Vladimir Putin.
Already last week, during an interview between the Russian President and Emmanuel Macron, the former recalled, for the first time, that Russia had a nuclear arsenal.
He will do it a second time afterwards.
For his part, Jean-Yves Le Drian, our Minister of Foreign Affairs, replied by saying that “Putin had to understand that the Atlantic alliance (NATO) was also a nuclear alliance”.
Sure,
one can see there demonstrations of force and the expression of this belief that this nuclear arsenal is precisely what prevents the States from going to war.
The problem is that opposite, there is a Russian president whose rationality raises questions.
We thus arrive at this new level crossed this Sunday.
As with the 1962 missile crisis, we rely on luck, hoping that the threats will never be carried out.
🔴 INFO - #Politics: Jean-Yves Le Drian (@JY_LeDrian), Minister for Europe and Foreign Affairs said: "Vladimir #Putin must understand that #NATO is a nuclear alliance".
(🎥@TF1Info) #NATO #UkraineConflict pic.twitter.com/krp9HuI171
— FranceNews24 (@FranceNews24) February 24, 2022
Access to this content has been blocked to respect your choice of consent
By clicking on "
I ACCEPT
", you accept the deposit of cookies by external services and will thus have access to third-party content
I ACCEPT
You can also modify your choices at any time via "choice of consent".
More information on the Cookie Management Policy page.
What should be the response of NATO countries to begin a reduction in tensions?
The first thing is to urge Putin to remove the alert status of his nuclear forces.
It is also to be hoped that the NATO countries do not follow Russia in this escalation, in turn preparing their nuclear arsenals.
It is also urgent to initiate a real process of talks on the conflict in Ukraine.
But above all, in the longer term, it will be necessary to finally implement nuclear disarmament.
There is already an international United Nations treaty on the prohibition of nuclear weapons (Tian).
It was ratified by around fifty states in October 2020, which led to its entry into force on January 22, 2021. But France, the United States, China, Russia, Great Britain have done everything to that this treaty does not succeed.
In July, the first meeting of the states that have ratified the Tian will be held.
We would like at least these nuclear powers, including France, to take part, at least as observers.
That they can understand why the majority of countries want this military denuclearization.
World
War in Ukraine: What hides the Russian outstretched hand at talks?
World
War in Ukraine: Is the French army ready for a high-intensity conflict?
Jean-Marie Collin evokes here a theory, a hypothetical climatic phenomenon of global drop in surface temperatures predicted as possibly being the result of a massive nuclear war.
Weapons
Nuclear
Russia
World
War
Vladimir Poutine
War in Ukraine
0 comment
0 share
Share on Messenger
Share on Facebook
Share on Twitter
Share on Flipboard
Share on Pinterest
Share on Linkedin
Send by Mail
To safeguard
A fault ?
To print