In episode 197 of the FAZ objection podcast, we are concerned with an old dispute that is gaining momentum: the sudden reduction in the status of the convalescent is met with criticism from administrative courts and the Bundestag's scientific service.
Corinna Budras
Business correspondent in Berlin.
Follow I follow
However, the resistance against the Bavarian Prime Minister Markus Söder, who announced without further ado that he would not carry out the facility-related vaccination obligation, was much more fierce.
Can he do that?
And what can the federal government do against this “constitutional affront”?
In the Berlin betting office case, the Federal Court of Justice decided whether the perpetrators benefited from the fact that the state - against better knowledge - did not prevent the murder.
Finally, we discuss the personnel quarrels at the Federal Finance Court and select a "fair verdict" of the week.
Here you
can see the entire range of FAZ objections - everything that is right.
And take out a
free, four-week trial subscription
here.
Please send feedback on the podcast to: einsprechenpodcast@faz.de
The topics of the program
02:52: Anger about the shortening of the convalescent status
16:42: How Markus Söder undermines the facility-related vaccination
requirement 41:06: The BGH and the murder in the betting shop
45:40: The staff disputes at the Federal Finance Court
57:42: Corrections
01 :02:28 Fair judgment