The line is nowhere near as narrow as is often claimed.
Everyone in this country can take a court decision politically as the wrong signal or have a different legal opinion.
That is quite a long way from the cliffs that descend into the grounds of the reprehensible attacks on the judiciary, where the third force is scorned and trust in the rule of law is shaken.
The board of directors of the World Medical Association, Montgomery, has gone there.
He did not slip, but jumped of his own free will, because he was upset that a court considered the 2G rule to be disproportionate: There are “little judges” who “stand up” and “tip over” measures, he said .
The decision after examining the factual and legal situation is a presumption of the court for Montgomery.
An incomparable disrespect!
Administrative courts have the task of controlling state action.
A vigilant judiciary is particularly important in times of a pandemic, the fight against which still requires painful restrictions on fundamental rights.
From the fact that courts intervene against excessive measures, people can see that the rule of law works in this exceptional situation.
Even if the conspiracy ideologues are upset about Montgomery: Ultimately, the medical president participates in their game of undermining trust in the system.