"Thousands of civilians dead": investigation overwhelms US military drone fire

A US Army Predator drone flying in the skies of Kandahar, southern Afghanistan, January 31, 2010. © AP - Kirsty Wigglesworth

Text by: RFI Follow

4 min

The

New York Times is

publishing

an edifying survey of the US military

this Saturday, December 18.

According to Pentagon reports revealed by the American daily, drone strikes, favored since 2014 in the conflicts in Afghanistan, Iraq and Syria, have claimed the lives of at least 1,600 civilians, probably many more.

The latter would have been killed by an institution " 

accepting that collateral damage is inevitable

 ".

Advertising

Read more

The US military often presents its

drone strikes

as a way of waging a "

clean 

"

war 

. With " 

precision strikes

 ", it engages fewer men directly in combat and ensures greater efficiency. All this image is swept away by the investigation published by the 

New York Times on

Saturday.

Within the framework of the law on transparency in administrations, the American daily obtained 1,300 reports from the Pentagon on incidents involving civilian victims.

And after more than five years of investigations, the conclusions of the

New York Times

are clear: “ 

The American air war has been marked by flawed intelligence, hasty and imprecise missile fire, and the deaths of thousands of civilians, including many. many children.

 "

Bad images, insufficient surveillance, misinterpretations of behavior ...

In five years, the United States military has carried out more than 50,000 airstrikes

in Afghanistan

, Iraq and Syria. She admitted to accidentally killing 1,417 civilians since 2017 in Syria and

Iraq

. In Afghanistan, the official figure is 188 civilians killed since 2018. And again, the

New York Times

, which has scrutinized the reports and investigated on the ground, says that the number of civilian victims recognized by the Pentagon is " 

clearly underestimated

 ".

The documents show that civilian deaths were often due to " 

confirmation bias

 ," the tendency to draw conclusions consistent with what is thought likely.

People running to a bombed site were seen as fighters from the Islamic State group, not rescuers.

Simple motorcyclists were considered to be moving " 

in formation

 ", which was interpreted as the " 

signature

 " of an impending attack.

A 5-year New York Times investigation into hidden Pentagon records shows that a pattern of failures in US airstrikes in the Middle East has killed thousands of civilians, many of them children.

None of these records show findings of wrongdoing.

https://t.co/6VCYUtSZXf

- The New York Times (@nytimes) December 18, 2021

According to Pentagon documents, misidentification accounted for only 4% of civilian casualties. But the

Times'

field investigation

shows they played a role in 17% of incidents, and most importantly, caused nearly a third of civilian deaths and injuries. Cultural factors also weighed heavily. The American soldiers thus judged that there was " 

no presence of civilians

 " in a house which they watched one day of Ramadan, whereas several families slept there during the day, period of fasting, sheltering themselves from the heat.

Poor quality images or insufficient surveillance duration often contributed to deadly strikes.

They also slowed down investigative attempts.

Of the 1,311 cases examined by the

New York Times

, only 216 had been deemed " 

credible

 " by the US military.

Reports of civilian casualties were rejected because the videos did not show bodies in the rubble or because they were not long enough to draw conclusions.

"Opacity and impunity"

The promises of transparency of the time of Barack Obama, who was the first American president to favor drone strikes to spare the lives of American soldiers, have been replaced by " 

opacity and impunity

 ", adds the daily , which had to file several lawsuits against the Pentagon and the US Army Central Command (Centcom) to obtain these documents.

Not a single report concludes with a fault or a disciplinary sanction

 ", adds the American newspaper, for which the investigation reveals " 

an institution accepting that collateral damages are inevitable

 ".

In the daily columns, Centcom spokesman Commander Bill Urban notes that " 

even with the best technology in the world, errors do occur, whether due to erroneous information or to misinterpreting information. available.

[...]

We do everything to avoid doing harm.

We are investigating all credible cases.

And we regret every loss of innocent life.

 "

(With AFP)

Newsletter

Receive all international news directly in your mailbox

I subscribe

Follow all the international news by downloading the RFI application

google-play-badge_FR

  • United States

  • Defense

  • Afghanistan

  • Iraq

  • Syria

  • Terrorism

  • Barack obama

  • Donald trump

  • Joe biden