China News Service, December 5th. According to a report by ChinaNet.com, the Supreme Court of Nevada ruled this week that gun manufacturers are not responsible for the 2017 Las Vegas mass shooting on the grounds that the state’s law protects manufacturers from exemptions. Responsible.

　　According to reports, this lawsuit was filed by the parents of a female deceased in the shooting in 2019. The court unanimously ruled that other gun manufacturers such as Colt Manufacturing Company are not responsible for the shooting.

The picture shows the frightened concert audience in the Las Vegas gun case sitting on the side of the road to rest.

　　The family of Carrie Parsons from Seattle claimed in the lawsuit that the manufacturer should be held liable because they knew they had violated several state and federal laws and still sold modifications that could be used with bump stocks. Into automatic firing guns.

　　But Judge Christina Pickering believes that Nevada law protects gun manufacturers from liability, and the court cannot overturn this ruling.

　　"We never underestimate the profound public policy problems and terrible tragedies caused by this mass shooting." Pickering wrote in his opinion.

"But this is an area widely occupied by the legislature. In this case, if gun manufacturers and distributors take civil liability from the gun company's standpoint, this decision should be made by the legislature, not this court."

　　"We urge the legislature to take action if it does not want to provide an exemption in this situation," she added.

　　The Las Vegas shooting is one of the deadliest shootings in modern history. 64-year-old Stephen Paddock shot in a room at the Mandalay Bay Casino Hotel, killing 60 concert audiences.

　　When the police arrived, Paddock was found dead in a hotel room with 23 guns in the room.

He was also found carrying a bumper butt, which is a device that can be attached to the weapon to make the gun fire faster.

Paddock fired more than 1,000 bullets at more than 2,000 people participating in the country music festival in about 10 minutes.

　　Parsons’ family members claimed in the lawsuit that the gun manufacturer stated in the advertisement that their guns were military weapons that could be modified by hitting the butt of the gun, so they were responsible for the crime.

　　After the shooting, the then Trump administration banned the sale of butt butts.