The "Traceability Report" of the United States is a "Pot Report" (Observatory)

　　Just after more than two months, the US intelligence community began to hype the issue of the source of the new crown virus.

Recently, the Office of the Director of Intelligence of the United States released a "decrypted version" report on the so-called tracing of the new crown virus, bringing out the "laboratory leak theory" and "fried rice."

At the end of August this year, the US intelligence agency issued a summary of the report, discrediting China without evidence.

　　It is a joke that intelligence agencies are involved in the scientific problem of virus traceability.

However, the US government ordered intelligence agencies to conduct a 90-day "investigation" in a serious manner, first compiling a summary and then concocting a full text, insisting on singing the old drama of politicizing the epidemic to the end.

　　Let's first look at the argument of the so-called "tracing report".

The report criticized China at the beginning, saying that "the first known case was found in China" and that "China did not have enough expectations for the spread of the virus", which made it clear that this is not a true scientific report of cocooning and silking, but a pre-set tone. , A script for making guilty inferences.

　　Let's look at the so-called "traceability report" evaluation method.

According to the report, four US intelligence agencies and the US National Intelligence Council assessed with "low confidence" that "the initial new coronavirus infection may be due to natural contact with animals infected with the virus or related progenitor viruses."

Another intelligence agency assessed with "medium confidence" that "the origin of the new coronavirus is most likely to be related to a laboratory accident, which may involve experiments, animal handling or sampling at the Wuhan Institute of Virology."

In fact, only one sentence was said throughout the article, and there was no reliable evidence to prove the "laboratory leak theory."

　　Let's look at the attribution of the so-called "tracing report".

The report attributed all the differences in the US intelligence community on traceability to China’s “blocking international investigations and refusing to share information” and “it requires China’s cooperation to make a final assessment of the origin of the new crown virus”.

What a mess, upside down black and white!

China's open and transparent attitude on the issue of virus traceability is obvious to all in the international community.

In the early stage of the epidemic, China shared the viral genetic sequence as soon as possible, and invited WHO experts to China twice to conduct traceability research and provide all conveniences for it.

In contrast to the United States, the timeline of the domestic epidemic has been advancing. Fort Detrick and the University of North Carolina's biological laboratories are all in bad condition, but they have never responded positively to international doubts.

This big hat of "obstructing international investigations" is most suitable for the United States.

　　Just as the United States was busy accusing China of weaving, the domestic epidemic situation was getting worse.

According to the "New York Times" statistics, as of November 10, there were 98,390 newly confirmed cases in the United States in a single day, with a total of more than 46.8 million confirmed cases and more than 759,000 deaths.

At such an urgent juncture, US politicians from both parties are still arguing over the basic issue of whether to get a vaccine.

A few days ago, Biden’s administrative order requiring more than 100 employees to be vaccinated against the new crown was judged "unconstitutional" by a court of appeals in New Orleans. Republican states such as Texas and Louisiana also strongly opposed the vaccine injunction, which distanced the United States. Widespread vaccination is one step further.

　　The United States has tried every means to "bring the pace" on the issue of the traceability of the new crown virus, kidnapping the WHO to carry out the so-called "second traceability" against China. This intention is clearly seen by the international community.

Last month, the World Health Organization announced the list of proposed new expert groups for virus traceability. In the first phase, 6 experts who had gone to Wuhan, Hubei to participate in traceability research were selected again.

They have all made it clear that the hypothesis of the Wuhan laboratory leak is "extremely impossible."

　　Rather than wasting a lot of effort to compose stories and deliberately spilling dirty water, the United States should listen to the just voice of the international community against the politicization of the traceability issue, and return to the right path of scientific traceability and cooperation in the fight against the epidemic as soon as possible.

　　Lin Zihan