The court dismissed the case and obligated him to pay fees and expenses

A company manager demands 1.5 million dirhams in compensation for his wastage accusation

The Abu Dhabi Family and Civil and Administrative Claims Court rejected the lawsuit of a company manager, requesting that the company pay him 1.5 million dirhams, in compensation for accusing him of squandering cash handed to him, and issuing malicious reports against him.

The court indicated that the company, in its complaint against the plaintiff and resorting to the judiciary, used its legitimate right guaranteed by the constitution and the law.

In the details, an employee filed a lawsuit against his employer, requesting that it pay him an amount of one million and 500 thousand dirhams, in compensation for the material and moral damages he sustained over two years, and obligating the defendant to pay fees and expenses and in exchange for attorneys' fees.

He indicated that he worked for the defendant as a manager for 21 years, and he was suspended without justification, and he filed a labor lawsuit against her, and a final judgment was issued in which she obligated her to pay him an amount of 572,727 dirhams, and hand him an experience certificate.

He explained that the defendant had filed criminal complaints against him in bad faith, with the intent of obstructing the labor case, and accused him of wasting cash handed to him by the company and its clients by way of agency.

The court decided to accept the appeal in form and reject it in substance, pointing out that the defendant company was not satisfied with that, but wrote a malicious communication and a ruling was issued in which the case was not allowed to be considered due to the previous decision, and the civil case was rejected, the appeal was rejected, and the appealed judgment was confirmed.

He pointed out that the defendant had filed a commercial lawsuit against him for his claim for the amount of one million and 971 thousand dirhams, and the lawsuit was rejected in the Court of First Instance and on appeal.

The plaintiff confirmed that he was harmed by the defendant’s filing of lawsuits in bad faith, and his suspension from work due to the criminal complaint of breach of trust, and the subsequent seizure of his passport and prevention of travel until the acquittal of the accusation, and depriving him of transferring his residence to another party and obtaining a source of livelihood, where he obtained Job offers, and the resulting fines for not renewing his residency, breach of obligations to repay the bank loan, and the consequent having to appoint a lawyer over two years, which required material compensation in addition to moral compensation for the depression he suffered, while the defendant’s agent provided He submitted a reply memorandum in which he concluded that the case should not be considered due to the fact that it was previously decided by partial labor judgment, and that the case was rejected for lack of validity and substantiation.

For its part, the court clarified that the plaintiff based his claim to claim compensation for the damages he sustained, as a result of the defendant filing a criminal complaint.

The court stated that the case papers were devoid of what indicated the defendant's bad faith or the abuse of her right, as well as what indicated the maliciousness of the lawsuit, and that what the plaintiff relied on did not go beyond the scope of the use of the legitimate right, and was guaranteed by the constitution and the law, which excludes the error necessitating responsibility, The request for initial compensation from the plaintiff was made without a document and must be rejected, and the court decided to reject the lawsuit, obligating the plaintiff to pay fees and expenses.

• The plaintiff based his claim on the damages he sustained as a result of the company filing a criminal complaint.

Follow our latest local and sports news and the latest political and economic developments via Google news