“Compensation for her dog.” A girl demands 100,000 dirhams from her ex-fiancé in Abu Dhabi

The Abu Dhabi Court of First Instance rejected a compensation claim filed by a girl against her ex-fiancé, accusing him of holding her dog and refusing to return it to her after the dissolution of their engagement, and demanded that he pay 100,000 dirhams in compensation for the damages she sustained. From her name to the name of her fiance.

In detail, a girl filed a lawsuit, requesting that her former fiancé be obligated to return her a "La Prado" dog, with an obligation to pay her 100,000 dirhams as moral compensation for the damages she sustained due to his refusal to return the dog to her, indicating that she was linking her to the plaintiff. He has an engagement relationship, and she got the dog from a center concerned with animal care, and she allowed her fiancé to keep the dog with him, and after the courtship relationship ended, he kept the dog and refused to return it to her to harass her, and I attached photos of telephone correspondence between them, and a copy of a certificate issued by an animal care center.

The court stated that, according to the Law of Evidence in Civil and Commercial Transactions, “the plaintiff must prove his right and the defendant has to deny it,” noting that what is proven from the document submitted by the defendant is that the plaintiff signed a statement indicating the transfer of the dog’s ownership from her name to his name, and then the latter became his The owner of the dog, the subject of the dispute, and the lawsuit was filed without a document that merits rejection, and the complainant’s insistence on having a certificate from a medical center concerned with animal care stating that the dog is registered with him in the name of the plaintiff does not change this.

The court indicated that the failure to change the owner’s name at the medical center does not affect the defendant’s ownership of the dog in question after the plaintiff signed the transfer of ownership to the defendant, especially since the plaintiff did not challenge her signature with an appeal and only denied what the defendant submitted, and the court ruled to reject The lawsuit and obligated the plaintiff to expenses and fees.

Follow our latest local and sports news and the latest political and economic developments via Google news