She demanded compensation for insulting her reputation and degrading her

A Gulf woman is suing her husband for accusing her of seizing his car and a gold locker

A Gulf wife filed a civil case against her Gulf husband, demanding that he oblige him to pay her reparation for the material, moral and psychological damage she suffered as a result of accusing her of seizing his car, the gold and perfume cabinet, watches and his clothes from his home, in cooperation with three unidentified persons.

She pointed out that a judicial ruling was issued by the Penal Court acquitting her of what was attributed to her, due to insufficient evidence, and the ruling became a force of order, because the defendant did not appeal the ruling.

She explained that the defendant deliberately harmed her through false fabrications, as defamation occurred between the police stations and the Public Prosecution, and her appearance before the court as an accused, and subjected her to abuse of her reputation among her family and relatives, and her feeling of humiliation and degrading of her dignity without any sin she committed, which led to her To file a lawsuit to claim compensation for the damages incurred by it, as the court deems appropriate with the extent of the damages, and to oblige him to pay fees, expenses and attorney fees.

In the case papers, the defendant denied the intent of maliciousness in the criminal complaint he submitted against the plaintiff, in which he claimed that the plaintiff and the maid attended his house in his absence, took his belongings and his car from the house, and kept them, pointing out that he had to file a complaint to recover what she took from him, according to What the law authorizes him to do, and not with the intent of harming her, and he demanded that the case be dismissed, for lack of validity and proof, and to hear witnesses, and to oblige the plaintiff to pay expenses.

The rationale for a total civil court ruling stated that the law stipulated that the plea that the court lacks jurisdiction due to the absence of its jurisdiction, or because of the type or value of the case, may be made in any state of the case, and the court shall rule on it on its own, pointing out that the judiciary settled on Article 85. From the Civil Procedure Code, which stipulates that the plea that the court lacks jurisdiction due to the lack of its jurisdiction, or because of the type or value of the lawsuit is related to public order, and the court shall rule on it on its own, and it may be pleaded in any case in which the lawsuit is.

The court stated that the partial civil circuit is competent in value to consider the case, and not the total civil circuit, and this value jurisdiction was related to public order, and the court ruled it on its own, pursuant to the text of Article 85 of the Civil Procedure Code, the court must rule that there is no value jurisdiction in considering the case. The case was ordered to be referred to the District Civil Court, which has jurisdiction.

Follow our latest local and sports news and the latest political and economic developments via Google news