The Taiwan History Textbook has only more than 300 words left on the contents of the Revolution of 1911

　　Chinanews.com, October 13th. Taiwan Affairs Office spokesperson Ma Xiaoguang said on the 13th that the so-called "new curriculum" for middle school history launched by the DPP authorities is full of content that "de-sinicizes" and advocates "Taiwan independence". The younger generation of Taiwan has encountered strong opposition from all walks of life in Taiwan.

Both the mainland and Taiwan belong to the same China, and the compatriots on both sides of the strait belong to the Chinese nation. No one can deprive Taiwan compatriots of the right to receive Chinese cultural education and understand national history as Chinese sons and daughters.

　　At the regular press conference of the Taiwan Affairs Office of the State Council held that day, a reporter asked. Recently, a Taiwanese educator pointed out that the "new curriculum" history subject launched in 2019 was "de-sinicized" by the DPP authorities, and the content was fragmented.

Recently, a Taiwanese scholar pointed out that 60 years ago, the history textbook of Taiwan’s middle school had more than 6,000 words about the Revolution of 1911. In the 2020 version, there are only more than 300 words left. Many young students simply cannot understand the facts and the meaning of the Revolution.

What is the spokesperson's comment on this?

　　Ma Xiaoguang said that the so-called "new curriculum" for middle school history introduced by the DPP authorities is full of content that "de-sinicizes" and advocates "Taiwan independence", poisoning the younger generation of Taiwan, and is strongly opposed by all walks of life in Taiwan.

　　Ma Xiaoguang emphasized that both the mainland and Taiwan belong to one China, and the compatriots on both sides of the strait belong to the Chinese nation. No one can deprive compatriots in Taiwan of the right to receive Chinese cultural education and understand national history as Chinese sons and daughters.

Any act of "de-sinicization" cannot separate the historical ties between the two sides of the strait and the blood ties of the compatriots on both sides of the strait, let alone change the fact that Taiwan is part of China.

　　Ma Xiaoguang pointed out that as far as the DPP authorities distorted history, downplayed or even wiped out the great achievements of Mr. Sun Yat-sen and the Revolution of 1911, it was precisely part of their promotion of "de-sinicization" and indirect "Taiwan independence", and the evil results were obvious.