• REBECA YANKE

    @RebecaYanke

    Madrid

Updated on Friday, 24September2021-02: 01

  • Share on Facebook

  • Share on Twitter

  • Send by email

Comment

  • The contradictions of Rocío Carrasco in the docuserie The judicial version versus the media version

  • Investigation The proven facts of the Rocío Carrasco Case: everything the Justice said about the accusations against Antonio David Flores

The sentence was brought forward to the autumn and the events to which it refers were the spring and even summer maelstrom in this country during 2021: the

media, social and political phenomenon

generated after the broadcast of the Mediaset

Rocío

docuserie

, tell the truth to continue Alive

, of which, also this fall, the sequel is expected to arrive. The first two episodes, broadcast on the night of Sunday March 21, caused the sudden dismissal of the collaborator of Save me Antonio David Flores, ex-husband of the daughter of the greatest.

EL MUNDO has had access to the full sentence of the Social Court number 42 of Madrid, which, dated September 20, decrees that “

the dismissal of the worker is null for violation of his fundamental right to honor

, condemning the defendant [the producer La Fábrica de la Tele] to the payment of the salaries not received until the date on which the temporary contract would have ended -32,361 euros-. (...) as well as additional compensation for the damages caused by the violation of his right to honor in the amount of 50,000 euros ”.

And through the more than 20 pages that the sentence consists of, the different people, media and political figures of the first level parade who, at that time of paroxysm and from different social angles, spoke out on the general issue, that is, that Rocío Carrasco had decided to "break a silence of 20 years", explain why it was, the reasons for the "null relationship with her children" and, above all, narrate an experience of abuse by her ex-husband who, so far , Justice has not considered appropriate to investigate.

Jorge Javier Vázquez

appears

but much more

Carlota Corredera

, collaborators of

Sálvame such

as

Alonso Caparrós

,

Kiko

and

Gema López appear

, of which the magistrate highlights that "it seems a risk to point out Antonio David with the word abuser because there is no sentence."

In the one that this newspaper reels today, dictated by the BTH magistrate, even the

tweet

mentions

that -in full broadcast of the first two chapters, between the draw of 12,000 euros and Jorge Javier taking off his glasses to see the screen of his mobile - The Minister of Equality,

Irene Montero

, published on her social network: "Rocío Carrasco's testimony is that of a victim of gender violence." And also that of

Adriana Lastra

, deputy secretary general of the PSOE: "Rocío Carrasco is a brave woman, a survivor."

At the time of elucidating the terms of the dismissal as a collaborator of

Sálvame

de Antonio David Flores, the sentence outlines in detail the broadcast of this program on March 22, 2021, a day after the docuserie premiered, which reached 33.4% audience. The magistrate says that “Save me began that day in an atypical way, with the set in the dark and projected on a large screen in front of which they had placed six chairs (which were occupied by the presenter and the collaborators), various fragments of the interview of Rocío Carrasco in the

Rocío

space

, tell the truth to stay alive

».

Antonio David had been summoned to such a program the previous Friday, he had an email informing him of it and his corresponding Ave Málaga-Madrid ticket. Around three o'clock in the afternoon of the same day 22, as the sentence narrates, he receives another email where he is dismissed "after the last known events of Rocío Carrasco." Before four in the afternoon the representative of Antonio David receives another email, with a proposed agreement to terminate the employment relationship. And a few minutes later, at four o'clock, Carlota Corredera goes out to the television arena.

That broadcast of

Sálvame

obtained an 18.3% audience share, a detail that is also referred to in the sentence, as well as the "burofax with the dismissal letter" that La Fábrica de la Tele sent to Antonio David on the same day 22 a 7:52 p.m., sent, according to the collaborator himself, to the address of his wife's store,

Olga Moreno

, -recent winner of the

Survivors

contest

, also broadcast on Mediaset- in Malaga and of which he did not know until April 9 .

The judge affirms that this dispatch coincides in time "with the end of the program in question" and adds: "What is relevant is not only that his dismissal was communicated or that the audience of the program in which he was lending services as a collaborator, but it was through said program that the actor -as well as all the viewers- learned of the termination of his employment relationship and the reasons for it, an extreme that is not unimportant ».

It is on page 14 of the sentence where

the judge disfigures the

modus operandi

of La Fábrica de la Tele

when he affirms that «in the same way that an email had been sent to dismiss him, another email could have been sent notifying him of the termination of the employment relationship ( ...) or having had a telephone conversation with him prior to the broadcast of the program ».

«This shows a deliberately sought will that the actor not know of his dismissal until the time of the broadcast of the program, which allows to corroborate

the purpose of the employer to obtain business profit from said dismissal

, reserving the exclusive of such information even with respect to the affected person.

For the judge, the program itself is a "dismissal letter", "without protection of freedom of expression." And he defines what happened as follows: “A kind of decision adopted by the employer who, considering the accusations made against him by Doña Rocío Carrasco to be true (...)

presents himself as a legitimate subject to deliver material justice that in her opinion was unduly Denied Rocío Carrasco in court

, consciously, deliberately and premeditatedly carrying out a parallel trial - public and widely disseminated - of the actor »(read Antonio David).

Of the six collaborators -

Alonso Caparrós

,

Belén Esteban

, Gema López,

Gustavo González

,

Marta López

and

Kiko Jiménez

- who attended the direct dismissal of Rocío Carrasco's ex-husband that day, the sentence affirms that they appear “serious, serious, judicious ( ...)

as if it were a popular jury

. And then the presenter, Carlota Corredera,

by way of verdict

, opens the program "announcing" the termination of Antonio David Flores' employment relationship with this television program, as well as with the La Fábrica de la Tele production company.

Judge BTH recalls in her ruling that "both the scenery and the expressions and messages transmitted and transferred by the management (through its presenter) to the audience of the program are aimed at labeling the plaintiff as an abuser."

The driver Carlota Corredera is in fact the one who is affected by the judge by stating that her responses throughout the broadcast "evidence the will of the employer to

use the dismissal to carry out a parallel public trial

on facts that were already the subject of a firm judicial decision and, ignoring these extremes, punish the actor in the way that is within his power, which is by transmitting to the audience that the plaintiff is an abuser and that for this reason he has been expelled from the television circuit over which Mediaset has jurisdiction ».

A temporal issue is also analyzed, that the last contract between the parties dates from December 11, 2020, "at which time it can be presumed that the preparation of the recording of the space is well advanced", referring to the docuseries.

“The defendant had to know the episodes that Rocío Carrasco was going to expose, and the accusations that he was going to make with respect to the actor, despite which he extended his contract until a date when all the episodes would have already been broadcast (.. .)

It is not, of course, a special sensitivity and awareness regarding the social scourge that constitutes gender violence

that motivates the company's actions, since if that were the case, it would have been enough not to extend the employment contract that linked it to the plaintiff, having terminated the employment relationship with him months before the broadcast of the program ".

According to the criteria of The Trust Project

Know more

  • Rocio Carrasco

  • Irene Montero

  • Madrid

  • Jorge Javier Vazquez

  • Adriana lastra

  • Survivors

  • Belén Esteban

  • Feminism

  • Gender violence

  • THE WORLD

  • HBPR

Tv'Sálvame ': "Bitter land" of reds and fags

PoliticsPablo Iglesias, Ignacio Aguado ... The Spanish 'tertullian cemetery' is not carried in Europe

TelevisionYlenia, unexpected muse of the? Team facha?

See links of interest

  • La Palma volcano live

  • Coronavirus news

  • Last News

  • Work calendar

  • Home THE WORLD TODAY

  • Master data new narratives

  • Surne Bilbao Basket - Casademont Zaragoza

  • Granada CF - Real Sociedad

  • Osasuna - Real Betis

  • Lenovo Tenerife - Unicaja

  • Cádiz - Barcelona, ​​live