A fraudster deceives a divorced woman and seizes 174 thousand dirhams

The Abu Dhabi Family Court obligated a man to pay 174,000 dirhams to a woman, with a delayed interest of 5%, after he deluded her that he held a large position in a government agency through which he could help her obtain a decision regarding custody of her son from her ex-husband in return for obtaining from her a sum of money. Financial.

In the details, a woman filed a lawsuit against a man, demanding that he pay her 174,000 dirhams, and the legal interest at 12% from the date of filing the lawsuit until full payment, noting that she is divorced and has a son and was seeking custody of her son from her divorced and the man took advantage of her position. He deluded her that he was occupying a high position in a government agency and would help her obtain a decision regarding custody of her son from her divorced one, in return for obtaining a sum of money from her, and accordingly she handed him 174,000 dirhams in installments, from them he received 7,000 dirhams in cash and the rest she transferred to him via Through an exchange company, a criminal case was released about the incident, in which the Criminal Court convicted the defendant of the charge against him and sentenced him to imprisonment for two months.

In the ruling, the court stated that it is legally prescribed by the Civil Transactions Law regarding the plaintiff’s first request to oblige the defendant to pay her an amount of 174,000 dirhams. At the time of usurpation, noting that the defendant admitted before the case preparation office an explicit and clear declaration that he had received from the plaintiff an amount of 174 thousand dirhams, and that he was occupied with this amount in favor of the plaintiff.

The court indicated that the plaintiff’s request to compel the defendant to pay her the delayed interest at the rate of 12% from the date of filing the lawsuit until the date of payment, it is decided to judge that the interest as a penalty for the debtor’s delay in repaying the debt despite its maturity is not considered usury that is prohibited by Sharia and law, which is Compensation for an assumed damage as a result of the debtor’s procrastination. The contrary is not accepted to prove, whether the obligation is civil or commercial, pointing out that the plaintiff’s request for interest is based on a factual and legal basis, which the court orders to oblige the defendant to pay the plaintiff the delayed interest.

The court ruled, obligating the defendant to pay the plaintiff an amount of 174 thousand dirhams (one hundred and seventy-four thousand dirhams), and obligating the defendant to pay the plaintiff the delayed interest at the rate of 5% of the amount judged from the date of filing the lawsuit until full payment, and obligating him to pay the fees and expenses of the lawsuit.

Follow our latest local and sports news and the latest political and economic developments via Google news