The Criminal Court imprisoned him and the Abu Dhabi First Instance Court obligated him to return the amount

A fraudster rents a villa he does not own for 105 thousand dirhams

The Abu Dhabi Court of First Instance ruled that a man must pay the last amount of 105,000 dirhams that he fraudulently seized, after impersonating an investor in a villa and renting it to the plaintiff and obtaining the rental value. The court also obligated the defendant to pay the plaintiff 10,000 dirhams in compensation.

In the details, a man filed a lawsuit against another, demanding that he pay him an amount of 105,000 dirhams with a delayed legal interest of 12%, with an obligation to compensate him for material and moral damages in the amount of 30,000 dirhams, in addition to fees and expenses and in return for attorney fees, noting that The defendant leased the villa to him for 105,000 dirhams and handed him the lease contract, but he was surprised that the villa was owned by another person, and a final criminal judgment was issued against him to imprisonment for two months for the accusation against him and obligating him to pay judicial expenses, and he admitted in the investigation records that he had received the amount of the claim.The court stated in the merits of the ruling, that what is established from the facts of the criminal case and the ruling issued in it is that the defendant managed to seize for himself a sum of money owned by the victim, and this was by using fraudulent methods and taking an incorrect capacity that would deceive the victim and force him to surrender, by impersonating the victim. Contrary to the truth, the description of an investor in a real estate unit and his desire to rent it, and he supported that lie by publishing an advertisement in one of the advertising newspapers with his desire to rent and made phone calls with the victim, and issued a lease contract and handed it over to the victim and received the rental value in cash, and by this means was able to deceive the victim and seize the rent in cash.

The rationale for the ruling indicated that the elements of compensation include the damage and harm suffered by the plaintiff after the defendant seized an amount of 105 thousand dirhams, which obstructed the interests of the plaintiff and deprived him of the opportunity to benefit from this amount throughout the period, which must be compensated by the plaintiff, and the court ruled to obligate the defendant To pay the plaintiff an amount of 105 thousand dirhams with delayed interest, while obligating the defendant to compensate the amount of 10 thousand dirhams for all material and moral damages, and obligating him to pay fees and expenses.

The accused published an advertisement in a newspaper about his desire to rent the villa.

Follow our latest local and sports news and the latest political and economic developments via Google news