A woman cuts her neighbor's guts out with a knife because of the inconvenience

An African woman faced the inconvenience of her neighbor and slapped her, with a violent reaction, as she stabbed him with a knife in the stomach, and expelled his intestines, and he underwent urgent surgery that saved him from death. She was imprisoned for three months and then deported. The ruling was appealed to the Court of Appeal, which upheld the initial ruling.


In detail, according to the case papers, the accused was in her shared residence, one morning last November, when her neighbor, the victim, rang the doorbell, so she opened to him and asked him what he wanted, so he asked her to let him in, but she informed him that everyone was sleeping, and she did not allow him to enter, so he pushed her and slapped her. On her face, she tried to stop him, but he pulled her from her hand and knocked her to the ground, so she sought the help of a neighbor for them and they took him out together.


After a while, the victim rang the bell again, so she pulled out a knife from the kitchen, and when she opened the door and found him, she stabbed him in the stomach, then went to her room and stayed there, and her assault resulted in a cut in the small intestine.


For his part, the victim said in the investigations of the Public Prosecution that he went to the accused’s apartment to take his clothes, which he had left to dry on the balcony of the apartment, but she refused and an argument broke out between them, so he pushed her, then brought a knife and stabbed him without knowing why she did so.


A neighbor of them testified that he heard the verbal altercation between them, and the victim slapped the accused, so he intervened to break up the quarrel, and the woman entered her apartment, while the victim remained talking in the corridor with the neighbors who gathered to check what happened, then the accused, who was in a state of great anger and stabbed the victim, returned with a knife and then returned to her apartment.


During the court session, the accused decided that she was in a state of self-defense, but the court responded in the merits of its ruling, that for the right to self-defense, there must be a danger of a crime to self or money, and it is not possible to resort to the authorities to ward off this danger, and this was not available in the incident.

Follow our latest local and sports news and the latest political and economic developments via Google news