Comprehensive news: Multinational media and people believe that the G7 summit is "not up to standard"
Xinhua News Agency, Beijing, June 14th. Xinhua News Agency's foreign correspondents report: The G7 summit closed on the 13th in Cornwall, southwestern England.
During the summit, media and people from many countries believed that the meeting was "not up to standard" and questioned the "commitments" made by the G7 in areas such as the new crown epidemic and climate change.
Lisa Nandy, the British shadow cabinet foreign secretary, said: "No matter how you look at it, this summit is not up to the standard. There is no clear plan to achieve the goal of vaccinating the world by the end of 2022, nor has it been made. An ambitious commitment to lead the world on the path to climate security."
In an interview with British Sky News Channel, former British Prime Minister Brown said that the summit will be recorded as "a moral failure" in the annals of history.
"The world needs 11 billion doses of vaccine. We only come up with a plan involving 1 billion doses of vaccine."
The German News Agency reported that people from the children's charity World Vision pointed out that the actual situation of the G7 vaccine donation pledge is "not as good as it sounds." One of the purposes is to divert people's attention and cover up its opposition to the release of vaccine patents. Attitude.
Tom Hart, the acting CEO of the NGO One Organization, said that the ideas and actions of the G7 have failed to match the current urgency of responding to the epidemic.
The result of this "uninspiring" summit is that the epidemic has been prolonged, not only in the world, but also in the G7 itself.
The Spanish “Rebel” website published an article that the leaders of the Group of Seven countries did not agree to exempt the new crown vaccine intellectual property rights to solve the shortage of vaccine supply.
In response to climate change, these countries do not plan to reduce subsidies to the fossil fuel industry. Private oil companies that receive large amounts of subsidies enjoy the profits of oil extraction.
Zhu Jianrong, a professor at Japan’s Toyo Gakuen University, said that the G7 summit can be described as thunderous and rainy, with great tone and little results.
Western countries have always been eloquent in assisting developing countries.
Falkl Chapke, honorary chairman of the Prussian Association in Berlin, Germany, believes that from a global perspective, the G7 is an old age group. These countries cannot represent people to solve global problems, especially in China, Russia or Said that the BRIC countries did not participate.
During the epidemic, we can see that the China-Europe Express has played an important role as an alternative to sea and air transportation.
Europe should cooperate more with China in the field of infrastructure, rather than hedge.
The South African Broadcasting Corporation published a review article saying that the main thrust of the G7 summit should be how to make the world more suitable for human life, rather than focusing on how to fight China and Russia.
The French commercial FM television station published an article on its website that an important topic of the G7 summit is to strengthen health monitoring and reform the World Health Organization to make it play a greater role.
Without China's participation, this will be a difficult task.
(Reporters involved: Xu Feng, Jiang Qiaomei, Jing Jing, Yue Dongxing, Bai Xu, Zhang Yuan, Xu Yongchun, Liu Pinran, Guo Dan, Chen Zhanjie)