Swiss refuse to ban synthetic pesticides
Outside a polling station in the administrative building of the Stadthaus in Zurich, Switzerland on June 13, 2021. SWITZERLAND - ARND WIEGMANN
Text by: RFI Follow
5 mins
Swiss voters largely refused Sunday, June 13 to ban synthetic pesticides.
However, they agreed to step up police measures against terrorism, despite criticism from the UN and human rights defenders.
Publicity
Read more
No major country has so far banned synthetic pesticides. Elsewhere in the world, Bhutan announced a few years ago that it wanted to become the first country in the world to make a living from “100% organic” agriculture. The Swiss refused on Sunday to engage their country - which is home to one of the largest manufacturers of plant protection products, the Basel group Syngenta, acquired in 2017 by the Chinese giant ChemChina - on this path.
“
It is a choice of reason and pragmatism, it is a choice which guarantees the future of our agriculture and which ensures the food security of our country.
This double "no" gives the agricultural world the opportunity to pursue its transition reforms towards more sustainable production
, "reacted the Swiss President, Guy Parmelin, at a press conference.
A first text, which called for the prohibition of synthetic pesticides within 10 years, as well as any importation of foodstuffs produced abroad using these products or containing them, was rejected at 60, 56%, according to final results.
Fought fiercely in the countryside, the ban, supported by environmentalists and the left, was also rejected in the cities of Geneva and Friborg.
The yes only won out in the canton of Basel-City - where Syngenta is located.
The committee that presented the text called on the government after the vote to "
regularly test the population for pesticide residues
".
Another initiative - rejected by 60.68% - provided that the subsidies of the Swiss Confederation to farmers be paid only to farms that do not use pesticides, ban the preventive or regular use of antibiotics and are able to feed their animals with the fodder they produce themselves.
Terrorism and human rights
Voters were also 56.58% in support of the law on police measures to combat terrorism, giving the police the means to act more easily as a preventive measure in the face of a "
potential terrorist
".
The police will be able to better monitor them, limit their movements and force them to participate in interviews, from the age of 12.
From the age of 15, people can be placed under house arrest for nine months, subject to court approval.
Left-wing opponents of the law believe that it does not respect fundamental rights, endangering the country's heritage in this area. The UN and several legal experts and human rights defenders had also cried out in danger. "
Switzerland will now have the least professional, most ineffective and most dangerous anti-terrorism law in the world - a major embarrassment for Switzerland as a rule of law,
" the UN rapporteur told AFP on torture Nils Melzer after the vote.
“
With this law, Switzerland is giving itself an imprecise definition of terrorism which opens the door to police arbitrariness. Spreading fear with political intent will already be considered terrorism, even if no threat of a violent act is established,
”lamented Patrick Walder, campaign manager at Amnesty International Switzerland.
The government ensures that fundamental rights will be guaranteed and argues that de-radicalization programs are insufficient for some people.
Even if Switzerland was spared from the jihadist attacks which hit Europe, the threat remains "
high
" according to the authorities, who argued that "
in 2020 two knife attacks, probably with" terrorist motivation ", have took place
”, in Morges and Lugano.
► To read also:
The Swiss called to the polls to ban or not synthetic pesticides
CO2 and Covid
The Swiss, on the other hand, narrowly rejected, by 51.59%, the law aimed at further reducing CO2 emissions by 2030. The law notably provided for an increase in the tax on fuel oil and natural gas, as well as the introduction of a tax on airline tickets departing from Switzerland.
“
Not going out of the ballot today is not a no to climate protection.
(...) Many people want to strengthen climate protection, but not in this way,
”said the Minister of Environment and Energy at the same press conference.
“
Climate change remains urgent, which is why we have to move forward and find a way very quickly
”.
For WWF, “
the winners of today's vote will be held to account tomorrow.
Switzerland is already causing climate damage to the tune of nearly 20 billion francs per year
”.
Another text put to the vote, the Covid law, giving the government additional powers to fight the epidemic and mitigate its effects on society and the economy, obtained the support of 60.21% of voters.
(With
AFP
)
Newsletter
Receive all international news directly in your mailbox
I subscribe
Follow all the international news by downloading the RFI application
google-play-badge_FR
Swiss
Environment
Coronavirus
Terrorism