Without the rockets on Israel, some say the injustice against the Palestinians would have been just another brief press release.
You need an audience.
Nobody falls into the arms of the fanatical settlers.
Conditions in the Gaza Strip are unbearable.
Starving people could not go on hunger strike, all they could do was violence.
Can a victim of violence be forbidden from attacking the perpetrator?
The local media always reported one-sidedly in favor of Israel and far too little about its illegal acts.
Something like that has been heard in the past few days.
In war there is a charge.
When you've done that, we will.
You treated us badly in 1948 and 1967 and 1973.
In 1987, they replied, you again rejected peace, and since then you have been waging guerrilla warfare.
In it, every act of violence that is perpetrated is justified by some incident.
International injustice should compensate for international injustice on both sides.
In addition, Israel has won all military conflicts since 1948.
Despite the often undesirable election results, it is a democracy, the only one in its region, a vital economy, a technical-scientific nation.
Being held hostage by terrorist groups
By comparison, every nation that has attacked Israel in the past seventy years does poorly.
You don't even know what a Palestinian state would look like in comparison.
The image that a Middle East without Israel is rid of all its problems is not only murderous, but foolish.
The idea that everything would be all right if this state finally existed is doubtful.
That is not an argument against the claim to such a state.
But it is an argument against the claim that between the present and the welfare of the Palestinians stands exclusively Israel.
The majority of the Palestinian people have been held hostage by terrorist groups, Hamas and Hezbollah, as well as Iran.
They dream of the annihilation of Israel, just as the right-wing radical settlers dream of the annihilation of the Palestinians.
The fact that the rocket attacks on Israel were a signal to the world to draw attention to the suffering of the people in the Gaza Strip means confusing an effect with the intentions. Inciting hatred within Israel also belongs in the description of the purposes pursued by Hamas. The war loves another war. For the same reason, Netanyahu does not, to say the least, hug the racist gangs in Israel. For the same reason he has nothing against the anger of the Palestinians, but has been fueling them for twelve years. Now there is silence for a second, but who thinks it will last?