• Palazzo dei Marescialli: the CSM will be the offended party in the investigation of the prosecutors on Amara minutes

  • CSM, Brescia prosecutor opens file on Amara's minutes

  • Csm, Spataro: "Abnormal behavior from Storari and Davigo"

  • CSM: Amara's secret report came out of the Milan Public Prosecutor's Office in February 2020

  • Secreted minutes and Masonic lodge: the dossier is investigated with the depositions of the lawyer Amara

  • Amara Dossier: from the "false conspiracy" Eni-Nigeria the start of the clash between the Milan prosecutors

Share

07 May 2021 The Milan prosecutor, Francesco

Greco, according to what is learned, is an offended party in the proceeding that sees Marcella Contrafatto

- the CSM employee who worked in Piercamillo Davigo's secretariat -

investigated in Rome for slander

- now suspended for having disseminated secret reports of interrogations made to the prosecutors of Milan by the lawyer Piero Amara. Greco's name appears in the letter attached to the classified envelopes sent to the newspapers in recent months. Greco was received in the afternoon in the office of the chief prosecutor of Rome, Michele Prestipino.



The defense of Greco

Greco, who filed a report to the Milanese Pg Francesca Nanni on the case of the reports made between December 2019 and January 2020 by the lawyer Piero Amara, declares that there was no inertia in the investigations, as instead claimed by the prosecutor Paolo Storari, who for "self-protection", according to him, handed them over in April 2020 to the then councilor of the CSM Piercamillo Davigo. As far as has been known, Greco maintains that the investigations on those declarations, which referred to the alleged secret lodge Hungary, were made, but with prudence and caution. The first three names, Amara, her former collaborator Alessandro Ferraro and her former partner Giuseppe Calafiore, were registered by secret association in May 2020. While Storari would have liked to register immediately, months earlier,at least 6 people to make records and wiretaps. IS,

according to Greco's reconstruction, it was the prosecutor who damaged the investigations by putting out those secret papers, placing them in Davigo's hands, without the knowledge of the top management

.



After the three registrations, the prosecutor had also involved the adjunct and anti-corruption manager Maurizio Romanelli: he turned over the cards, including the minutes of the 'discord', so that he could read them as the intention was to strengthen the pool of prosecutors who dealt of the case. Then, in a meeting in September it was decided to transmit the documents to the Prosecutor's Office of Perugia (where they actually arrived last January), because Eni's former external lawyer brought up several Roman magistrates. At that time there was also a joint interrogation of Amara by the Milanese and Perugia prosecutors.



Storari, who was the owner, together with the adjunct Laura Pedio, of the investigation into the 'false Eni plot' in which Amara is being investigated and in which those minutes were collected, on 8 April last informed Greco that he had delivered the papers to I started a year earlier. And this is because the prosecutor only in that period knew that the Roman prosecutor was investigating the former secretary of Davigo for the dissemination of those secret papers. Storari stripped off the files on the 'false plot' and the one on the revelation of official secrecy, which then went to Rome.



Meanwhile,

Greco and Storari in recent weeks had also been the protagonists of a dispute in the internal chat of the prosecutor

, after the trial on the Eni-Nigeria case, on which the Prosecutor was focusing a lot, all acquittals had arrived, in mid-March. Both Amara and the former Eni manager and defendant Vincenzo Armanna were very 'valued' by the prosecutors of the Nigeria case, including the adjunct Fabio De Pasquale, while Storari had a different line in the investigations and also assessed profiles of slander in their statements . On the conduct of the investigation he also came into conflict with the adjunct Pedio, as well as with Greco.



Tomorrow, in Rome, Storari will be heard

Accompanied by the defender, the lawyer Paolo della Sala, the magistrate intends to answer (except for surprises) to the questions and to clarify a story that is creating more than a bad mood inside the Milanese courthouse . 

Storari is ready to demonstrate, e-mail in hand, that the prosecutor's activity would not have been swift and that his requests for investigations would have been ignored by the prosecutor Francesco Greco

. Storari will explain why he considered the only way to avoid prejudicing the investigations to contact Davigo and hand him a copy - in word format and without signature - of the secret reports. Minutes then arrived anonymously on the desks of some newspapers, a matter that concerns the former secretary of Davigo (suspended and investigated for slander) and in which Storari has no role. The confirmation by Storari of what was said by Davigo, that is, that the delivery of the secret reports took place in Milan, could involve the transfer by territorial jurisdiction of the dossier on the disclosure of office secrecy to Brescia, the competent prosecutor on Milanese robes. In the capital, only the investigation linked to the slander would remain, against the leaders of the Milan prosecutor's office.