Yoo In-tae "It wasn't for LH to lose the Democratic Party...it is desirable to move first in 2030"

[Youngjin Joo's News Briefing]

When citing the interview, please indicate the program name'SBS <Youngjin Joo's News Briefing>' correctly.

Copyright is with SBS.

■ Broadcast: SBS <News Briefing of Joo Young-jin> Mon-Fri (14:00-16:00)

■ Progress: Anchor Joo Young-jin

■ Interview: Former National Assembly Secretary-General Yoo In-tae

--------------- -----------------------------

▷ Joo Young-jin/Anchor: Regardless of political issues, regardless of the opposition party, he speaks to you in a clear manner. I'm the one who gives it.

Former Democratic Party member In-tae Yoo came out.

Welcome to.

▶ In-tae Yoo/Former Secretary-General of the State Company: How are you?

▷ Joo Young-jin/Anchor: Last week, you probably heard a lot of stories about the results of the re-election and answered a lot, but isn't there a lot of stories like this from the Democratic Party right now?

Why lost, why lost How should we change in the future?

What do you think of former Congressman In-tae Yoo?

▶ In-tae Yoo/Former Secretary-General of the State Company: I am supposed to lose the local elections held at the end of the original presidential term.

▷ Joo Young-jin/Anchor: Did you say it several times?

▶ In-tae Yoo/Former Secretary-General of the State Company: Well.

So, anyway, because of the coronavirus quarantine, the current presidential approval rating is still quite maintained. But of course, the LH crisis erupts just before the election and those things that anger Kim Sang-jo's so many citizens have been overwhelmed and have been doing it. Even if it wasn't, it was pretty much the difference between the votes.

As I was the chairman of the city party in 2006, I experienced losing more than a double score with candidates Se-hoon Oh and Kum-sil Kang at that time.

▷ Joo Young-jin/Anchor: At the time, former Minister Kang Geum-sil had a gust of purple and purple, so there were a lot of polls at first.

▶ In-tae Yoo/Former Secretary-General of the State Company: There were a lot of them.

▷ Joo Young-jin/Anchor: In the end, the opinion polls of former Minister Kang Geum-sil were high, so it seemed that the opposition party changed the candidate for mayor of Seoul at that time.

▶ In-tae Yoo/Former Secretary-General of the State Company: We changed it.

Minister Maeng Hyung-gyu probably had to come out as it was, but at that time, I thought I would not do politics Oh Se-hoon, who gave a very fresh shock that he quit.

▷ Joo Young-jin/Anchor: Mayor Oh Se-hoon had a plan?

▶ In-tae Yoo/Former Secretary-General of the State Company: We all had plans.

▷ Joo Young-jin/Anchor: Everyone had a plan.

▶ In-tae Yoo/Former Secretary-General of the State Company: It seems that there was a (planned) non-run.

▶ In-tae Yoo/Former Secretary-General of the State Company: (Commentary) From then on, are you probably 3 Kim?

In particular, the former President Kim Dae-jung also declared his political retirement after the presidential election, but since he was also president in the end, the people don't seem to believe it as it is, even if he doesn't run for now.

▶ In-tae Yoo/Former Secretary-General of the State Company: There were all planned non-runs after that, I see.

▷ Joo Young-jin/Anchor: But I talked to two former lawmakers a while ago, so the Democratic Party should change, we need to know why we lost.

Even during the crisis of former Minister Cho Kuk, the people felt tired because of the terrible conflict.

Just because they said this, the first 5 members of the first election and the party members who are classified as strong family members are openly saying, ``Stay back, blame the president for the loss and have been elected, or are you good enough, you don't need politicians like you'' How do you look at this situation where your voice is just boiling again?

▶ In-tae Yoo/Former Secretary-General of the State Company: First of all, a meeting of the first elections, and a movement like that of five young people is very desirable.

▷ Joo Young-jin/Anchor: Is it desirable?

▶ In-tae Yoo/Former Secretary-General of the State Company: Sure.

If there is no such thing, the party loses its vitality.

Of course, it hasn't been a year since the first year, so I couldn't do that from the first year, and now the first elections are people who weren't lawmakers in their country, last year.

Last year, you had a conflict between Chu and Yoon, the first choices.

It is desirable, but some of the people who do that or that personal aggression or that are actually some of the so-called stiff family members are called.

I still don't know if it's the majority, that's me too.

But we have to go to a productive discussion.

I have to go, but it is true that I was a little unfair when I talked about the situation in my country with first-time lawmakers and friends I know.

All the so-called people stack up all the specs like that.

By the way, is it 4 years for me from the 1st trial?

▷ Joo Young-jin/Anchor: 4 years imprisonment.

▶ In-tae Yoo/Former Secretary-General of the State Company: Seeing the ruling, I was also very surprised.

How can you make a judgment like that, is it such a tremendous crime?

There is some sympathy that Minister Cho would be quite unfair, but that doesn't mean that it's not ashamed that a senior citizen of the Blue House invested in a fund to get more wealth, or that only a few privileged groups did to build up children's specs?

To be ashamed is to be ashamed.

The aspect of being a little excessively damaged by the prosecution of Yoon Seok-yeol.

So, there are two sides, but now one side has done so only with the aspect of being retaliated against by the prosecutors who are trying to reform the prosecution.

But that person didn't do anything well.

You didn't beat someone who wasn't doing anything wrong and who was in good shape.

So you have to look at both sides. I think so.

▷ Joo Young-jin/Anchor: The words that former lawmaker In-tae Yoo said needs to be organized.

When I met the first members of the Democratic Party about former Minister Cho Kook, is there a little unfair side?

At that time, all parents living in Gangnam seemed to have done so, but there is a perception that they were subjected to excessive retaliation investigations by the prosecution because of their homeland.

However, if you think about it, there is definitely no good thing.

▶ In-tae Yoo/Former Secretary-General of the State Company: Right.

▷ Joo Young-jin/Anchor: If you didn't do that, you wouldn't have been punished for doing such an investigation, and most of all, former lawmaker Yoo In-tae said that a public official was the chief civil servant, and that such a person would pay more money anyway.

▶ In-tae Yoo/Former Secretary-General of the State Company: I can't imagine that.

▷ Joo Young-jin/Anchor: Is it unacceptable?

▶ In-tae Yoo/Former Secretary-General of the State Company: Right.

▷ Joo Young-jin/Anchor: Okay.

But then, the Democratic Party should change in the future.

How do the people know that the Democratic Party is changing?

How do you know?

▶ In-tae Yoo/Former Secretary-General of the State Company: Now, when there are a lot of lawmakers who make remarks without paying attention to the so-called leadership or the Blue House, that will change when something happens.

▷ Joo Young-jin/anchor: At the convention, a new representative is elected, and the president of the hospital is elected right away, and who is the problem of such a person is not very important?

▶ In-tae Yoo/Former Secretary-General of the State Company: But now, the Democratic Party is the old non-mainstream.

At that time, there were obviously liquor and non-alcohol.

In 2007, as President Roh Moo-hyun almost became abandoned at the end of the year, Jung Dong-young and Kim Han-gil were very excluded from the pro-nuclear family, and if they went out to the party, they could get the government. I ran out and it didn't work, so what later.

▷ Joo Young-jin/Anchor: Grand Unified Democratic Party.

▶ In-tae Yoo/Former Secretary-General of the State Company: After meeting again, and in the end, the people who usually did that last time followed Ahn Cheol-soo in 2015, and almost all of the people with regional districts in Honam were elected again, and now there is no such kind of non-mainstream.

I would like to exclude anyone and leave our party as well. I am not so worried because it is not a division like this now.

And, for example, it is widely said that all of them are family friends, but in the meantime, it has been said that there are people who are not family friends in our party among themselves.

▷ Joo Young-jin/Anchor: Yes.

▶ In-tae Yoo/Former Secretary-General of the State Company: And when it was the last convention, for example, in the case of Hong Young-pyo right now, Lee Hae-chan and other candidates were pushed, the same.

Then, Lee Hae-chan is not like that.

So, if you look at it broadly, it means that it doesn't get so straightforward like the old days. Mainstream and non-alcoholic.

▷ Joo Young-jin/Anchor: But I feel that the Democratic Party is changing.

Isn't the lawmakers doing this because of the tensions about next year's presidential election?

Because of the thought that I could lose in this way.

Who will be the candidate will be the next question.

People can see that the Democratic Party is changing in this situation.

According to what you said earlier, at the time of the Uri Party, 108 members of the first elections each made their own voices and heard that they were one hundred eight hundred and eight, and this time when the first members of the lawmakers held a press conference, we have been self-respecting for that.

However, he made a voice because he thought that we shouldn't just be self-respecting anymore.

In the future, if the lawmakers each speak out, the Democratic Party will do that again.

▶ In-Tae Yoo/Former Secretary-General of the State Company: This time, not each, but the first generations made a single voice.

So that's pretty good.

And there are some party members who have different thoughts, but I don't think there is a need to be too aggressive.

We should discuss with each other and go in that direction.

▷ Joo Young-jin/Anchor: However, in this situation, President Moon Jae-in said that the president directly took the public's voice seriously and the reprimands severely through a spokesperson last time regarding the re-election, but the president directly responded to the results of the re-election. Wouldn't it be necessary to say in person, what do you think of the public will that appeared, and how and where I will focus on the term of office that will remain for about a year in the future?

▶ In-tae Yoo/Former Secretary-General of the State Company: There are two by-election facts.

▷ Joo Young-jin/Anchor: But it's the mayor of Seoul and the mayor of Busan, not elsewhere.

▶ In-Tae Yoo/Former Secretary-General of the State Company: Anyway, it was an election that shouldn't be a candidate, but don't change the party constitution.

▷ Joo Young-jin/Anchor: Is there a lot for former CEO Lee Nak-yeon to say?

▶ In-tae Yoo/Former Secretary-General of the State Company: It is said that he received the will of the party members by voting as a party member back then, but he was the representative at that time.

I said that CEO Nak-yeon Lee should have bet one game at that time, and this is not a candidate.

Even if many members of the party wish to do so, does the party leadership make a referendum on all matters under the administration of the president's state affairs?

It doesn't.

Then you just need to crush it.

I will keep the party constitution, and I will not give up a candidate.

▷ Joo Young-jin/Anchor: As former lawmaker Yoo In-tae grasps, the fact that the party members also agreed that a candidate should be presented while changing the Party Constitutional Regulations at the time.

Representative Lee Nak-yeon's will, rather than a conviction, had a great intention of the Blue House. Do you see it like this?

▶ In-tae Yoo/Former Secretary-General of the State Company: I don't know the intention of the Blue House, and many lawmakers and no party members. I said to go.

But even then, I shouldn't change the party constitution on the broadcast several times, candidate.

When making that constitution, how would a party that does it without controversy, does not practice it, and immediately throws away devotion to the people?

▷ Joo Young-jin/Anchor: You said it was a careless thing.

But it was President Moon Jae-in who made the party constitution again.

▶ In-tae Yoo/Former Secretary-General of the State Company: Yes.

So this time, anyway, this time, we should have kept the party constitution.

And if there is a little more insight, then in an election that is likely to lose, the party constitution is corrected and a candidate is issued.

So, since I was only winning so far, I was intoxicated with victory.

▷ Joo Young-jin/Anchor: But before the election, isn't there a candidate or a political party that you think you'll lose?

▶ In-tae Yoo/Former Secretary-General of the State Company: Still, considering the timing, even without the LH incident, this was an election that was supposed to be lost.

▷ Joo Young-jin/Anchor: This is the last question.

In order for the Democratic Party to change in the future, the voices of the members of the strong family members and the voices of the members of the lawmakers should be well-constructive discussions, but if you go out, you are wrong, only us are right. I also think of it.

▶ In-tae Yoo/Former Secretary-General of the State Company: It's a little noisy now, but it's a little noisy after losing like this.

However, when the noisy period lasts as long as 2007 and 2015, and the antagonism becomes so, when the so-called soybean flour family becomes a so-called soybean flour family, the people will be awful and unbelievable, but it will be a little noisy.

It will be a little noisy until the convention.

▷ Joo Young-jin/Anchor: When Rep. Yoo In-tae appears next week, who will be the representative of the hospital, I will talk about the Democratic Party at that time and then ask about the power of the people.

I listened to you today. 

※ For more information, you can check the video.

(SBS New Media Department)