[World Report] Ramsay saying "Yakuza gangsters are Koreans"... Waves and waves continue to appear'deprecating Koreans'

● Villagers explain'Gap Tuk Thu' deprecating Koreans…

"Koreans gang"

is also true that Harvard was a RAM built in this paper, I think the one reported for the comfort women victims distortion thesis of Professor going almost one month gotta close to distorting history, Korea getnya surely come again.

However, I stumbled across on Twitter that people in Japan were controversial in English over Professor Ramsey's thesis on the villagers (the lowest-class people who were severely discriminated against in Japan).

I was curious about the content, so I searched for the thesis, but I was able to immediately confirm that there were derogatory comments from Koreans that were not related to the thesis topic.

The paper was titled ``The Politics and Organized Crimes of Fallouts in Japan,'' which Professor Ramsey co-authored with Professor Rasmussen of the Indiana University School of Business and published in the Journal of Empirical Legal Studies in March 2018. .

Both authors explained villagers and compared them with the Korean concept of butchery.

He stated that it was the group in the most similar situation, and that in Korea, the identity of Butcher seems to have been erased during the Korean War.

It is possible to explain this concept, but in the paragraph under the subheading <The Villagers and the Mob>, he concluded that most of the men in Japanese gangs are minority groups such as Koreans and villagers.

Below, he wrote that a high-ranking official of Yakuza Kuodai, who is active in Fukuoka, stated that 70% of the organization was either villagers or Koreans.

Suddenly, while explaining the Japanese Yakuza, the Korean story is like a ‘gap-flick’.

I felt like I was hitting the back of a person I didn't care about, but the reason for the explanation was poor.

As you can see from the comments below, the source was the Internet address of the Livedoor blog.

Prof. Ramsay's Blog Quote The newcomer has already checked several times, so it wasn't surprising now, but when I entered this address, it was just a personal blog.

A Japanese blogger saw a documentary starring a member of the Yakuza organization and wrote down the contents, and it was surprising that he continued to write these contents courageously as references for academic papers.

If you quote your school homework on a blog, you'll notice the teacher, but it was even more shocking to know that this sloppy quote was not filtered out at this time and was published in academic papers.

asked Professor Alexis Durden of the Department of History at the University of Connecticut, who has an in-depth knowledge of Japanese and Korean history, to comment on the contents of this thesis.

(Professor Durden is so friendly and always explained in detail the historical background, which helped us understand the situation.) Professor Durden selectively selected the historical facts from Ramzier and his colleague Rasmussen to suit his taste. Pointed out that you have made an error to take.

This kind of technical attitude was simply defined as racism or racism.

In the American way, all immigrants are said to be criminals, but he said he couldn't understand what he wrote in academic journals this way.

Regarding the content of this paper that most Koreans are organized gangsters, he affirmed that "it's just not true," he explained. "Ramzier claims that Korean women are prostitutes, and that men are gangsters."

It analyzed that the pattern of trying to label a specific group of Koreans and hatred and hatred continues to emerge.

Professor Durdon asked if it would be true if he saw the movie'The Godfather' and said that all Italians are gangs.

I also asked about Professor Ramsey's distorting dissertation on comfort women victims, and it was quite unusual for the journal to give Ramsay time to call by the end of this month to find evidence that does not exist.

He said he had been working on the Internet in a matter of days to find a rebuttal to Professor Ramsey's thesis, but he said he didn't know what he could do for such a long time.

However, he affirmed that the conclusion was fixed.

This is like a simple arithmetic, so I predicted that if I added another zero state to the zero state with no evidence, the answer would continue to be zero.

I asked if Professor Ramsey was likely to claim where he found the contract, and he replied that although it is unlikely, who would admit that the contract signed by a 14-year-old girl would have a legitimate effect, even if it was so.

I learned during this interview, but the co-author of this paper, Professor Rasmussen, was featured on the ``Hate Tweet'' incident on U.S. terrestrials such as CBS and ABC in August 2019.

As I searched for related articles, I confirmed that the level of the content is very difficult to tolerate in American society.

On Twitter, he wrote a sexist remark that "geniuses are overwhelmingly male", and "Lexotic minors shouldn't enter college."

"Black students are inferior to white students and are not eligible for admission."

At the same time, there was a fierce debate about the extent to which the freedom of expression of university professors should be guaranteed in the U.S. as they are crying out for freedom of expression.

Since terrestrial broadcasters reported all over the United States, it was a very big incident for Indiana University.

Professor Rasmussen was still on unpaid leave as school authorities began an investigation.

The dean also made a statement in person and arranged the course of Professor Rasmussen's problem.

(Rasmussen complained in several places on Twitter that the dean is trying to cut him off.) Even so, it is the American university atmosphere that makes it difficult for a professor with a guaranteed term of office.

There were many prospects that Professor Rasmussen would not be dismissed from school.

Professor Rasmussen has publicly documented himself in several places as close associates with Professor Ramsey.

In particular, he also proclaimed himself as an allied army for this comfort women distorted paper.

Beyond that the thesis itself had no problem, I was able to find an Internet record that criticized scholars and students who criticized it and poured out primary criticism.

(I was able to find accusations against Professor Yuji Hosaka as well as Harvard university students.) When I asked another American professor, he was evaluated as "a very notorious person in American academia, an unpredictable character."

In fact, I have no reason to say that I am taking the side of Ramsay as a spectator, but being the author of a distorted paper is a different story.

I asked Professor Rasmussen about his position on this paper with the same intensity as he asked Professor Ramsey, but he also showed an attitude that he would respond positively, asking him to send the question first.

I don't think I know how hot the debate has been on this issue in Korea, but when I asked for an interview, I sent a report that had been out so far, and when I saw it all, I expressed my surprise.

Yesterday I was waiting until midnight, saying that I would decide whether to do an interview, but the issue was so hot that I had to respond well, but I refused the interview, saying that I had no time.

Professor Rasmussen, who argues that hate speech is also freedom of expression, and Ramzier, who argues that the comfort women are contract prostitutes, made a serious mistake of distorting the identity of the group of Koreans into a group of gangsters without any grounds.

In fact, it was a pity that the efforts were made to infiltrate the Japanese far-rights' view of spreading hatred and hatred toward Koreans beyond distortion into the academic world in this way.

Prof. Ramsey's thesis keeps coming up with the wave problem, but I even thought I would stop it.