District Attorney Lars Magnusson believes that large parts of the evidence against the suspects in the hunting crime complex can be found in the initial interrogations with the accused woman.
Interrogations held before she withdrew from the investigation.
Lars Magnusson had hoped to play the interrogations - but the court said no.
The reason was that the woman has the right to say no to testifying against relatives, in this case her husband, which she does not want.
The court also believes that the woman also had no defender at these interrogations.
Now that she is a suspect and accused, it will be strange to play interrogation as she had no defender, the court reasoned.
Instead, Lars Magnusson had to interrogate the woman via a link from a smaller room in the district court.
The woman then chose not to answer questions about her initial accusations against Karl Hedin and her husband.
She referred to the letters she wrote and explained that she felt very bad during the time she contacted the police.
Her husband also answered the prosecutor's questions briefly.
Regarding the interrogation with Karl Hedin, the company manager admitted that he was interested in and researched various poisons that can kill wolves, but he denies that he would have handed over poison to the couple.
It was close that Magnusson was also not allowed to interrogate the police officers who had contact with the woman when she testified against her husband, but the court gave permission for that, provided that the questions are not about the woman's testimony.
Wednesday's negotiations will therefore begin with questioning by the police.
SVT will be on site and report live.