• Dina case. Commissioner Villarejo complains against Pablo Iglesias in the Supreme Court for a crime of false reporting

  • Reasoned statement The Supreme Court refuses to open a case to Pablo Iglesias and asks Judge Manuel García Castellón to exhaust the investigation of the 'Dina case'

The

Supreme Court

has rejected this Wednesday the complaint that the commissioner linked to the sewers of the State

José Manuel Villarejo

filed against the Vice President of the Government Pablo Iglesias and the deputy of United We Can

Gloria Elizo

for crimes of accusation and false complaint in the so-called

Dina case

.

This new order comes after the Criminal Chamber returned to the magistrate Manuel García Castellón the reasoned statement against the leader of United We Can with the aim that the instructor exhausts the investigation into the theft and subsequent dissemination of information from the mobile phone of the former Churches assistant,

Dina Bousselham.

In his complaint, Villarejo maintained that the vice president of the Government "instrumentalized" the separate piece Dina to try to obtain political revenue, accusing him of being behind the dissemination by a media outlet of internal chats of a group of Podemos stored in the stolen mobile from Bousselham.

In the order notified this Wednesday, a presentation by magistrate

Andrés Martínez Arrieta,

the Chamber explains that "we must necessarily reproduce in this resolution the content of the Order of last January 27 in which the file of the case regarding the crime object of the complaint, accusation and false accusation, based on the insufficiency of the factual account in the description of the facts and the absence of the condition of prosecution of the second paragraph of article 456 of the Penal Code ".

The court recalls that the crime of false complaint is not prosecutable in this case since "the complainant or accuser may not proceed if not after a final judgment or order also signed, dismissal or file of the Judge or Court that has heard of the offense accused, a condition that does not exist in the present case. "

In addition, at the time of inadmissibility of the complaint filed by the commissioner, the judges of the High Court rely on the report of the Public Prosecutor's Office that defended that the events denounced by Villarejo were "plagued with assessments that have no required evidence."

According to the criteria of The Trust Project

Know more

  • Dina bousselham

  • Jose Manuel Villarejo

  • Pablo Iglesias

  • We can

  • Supreme court

JusticiaPodemos accuses Judge Manuel García Castellón of endangering the prestige of justice for his actions in the 'Dina case'

Government PartnerPodemos intensifies its offensive against journalists with its fake news website

PSOEBono: "We can paint very little in the Government, hopefully there are left to dress altars"

See links of interest

  • Work calendar

  • Real Madrid - UCAM Murcia

  • Almeria - Seville