In the program "Without appointment", Friday on Europe 1, the psychoanalyst and sexologist Catherine Blanc mentioned the possible existence of a G-spot in men, particularly stimulated during prostate massage.

But if the word is freed around this practice, all men are not necessarily open to it.

Is there, in men, an equivalent to the point G of women (zone whose existence, or not, is debated)?

In the program Sans rendez-vous, Friday on Europe 1, the sexologist and psychoanalyst Catherine Blanc notably mentioned the sensitivity of certain men when their prostate is stimulated.

The chronicle of Catherine Blanc

First of all, I'm pretty dubious about the G-spot in women.

It is not that there are not, of course, because there are areas which are particularly sensitive, but we see that the areas in two different beings are not sensitive in the same way.

For X reasons, we invest more or less parts of our body, or we do not want to discover certain parts of our body because that sends us back to positions or situations that are disturbing.

So, as such, the G-spot in men considered to be at the level of the prostate would involve a digital rectal examination or rectal penetration of a finger or penis.

Obviously, you understand that not all men want to feel called upon.

Not because that would not be a source of pleasure, but because it sometimes sends them back to anxiety-inducing postures, in the bond with the other and in the representation they have of themselves.

Does this prostatic pleasure really exist?

On an erogenous zone there is a wonderful nervous system tissue.

So obviously there is a feeling.

A feeling that can be extremely eroticized.

So, as such, all men have an interest, eventually, to go there and be surprised.

But they also have the right not to wish it.

Many men could not imagine for a single second being solicited from this point of view, including elsewhere when it is for medical reasons.

Some are precisely afraid that it will create pleasure in a medical connection.

Which is also quite funny because women go to gynecologists, and they do not ask themselves the question of whether being penetrated by a speculum would risk bringing about an enjoyment of penetration.

Do all men accept this stimulation?

This is the whole difficulty.

It is up to man to be able to express their desire.

Some will ask for it, but others will not, in the hope that it will be done all the same.

Also, a woman can feel very uncomfortable if the man himself is uncomfortable to be in this position, to be penetrated with a finger or a toy. .

As for the woman, she can be very uncomfortable at the idea of ​​being penetrating because it sends her back to a posture that does not correspond to her gender and the idea that she has of her gender.

Is this a new practice?

There is no fashion in sexuality, there are simply words that are released, and people who can ask the question and dare to tend towards curiosity.

Some dare and come back to their past practices and integrate it into their practice.

All this obviously depends on the game of the couple, the game of the relationship, the image that each has of oneself and this shared intimacy.

Our intimacy is emotional intimacy and it is more than bodily intimacy.

Our emotions are, for each other, vacillating and easy to welcome sometimes and sometimes not, it is to be invented within the couple.