His privacy was attacked without his knowledge

15,000 dirhams in compensation for a man because of a photo in a government agency

The court obligated the subsidiary appellant to pay the case fees and the expenses of the two current appeals.

Archives

The Court of Appeal ruled to overturn a judgment of the Court of First Instance, requiring a man to pay another compensation in the amount of 5,000 dirhams, for assaulting his privacy and photographing him in a government agency without his permission, and the Court of Appeal decided to increase the amount of compensation to 15,000 dirhams.

In the details, a man filed a civil lawsuit against another, in which the ruling demanded that the defendant pay him an amount of 500 thousand dirhams as compensation for his material and moral damages, and 12% interest due to his assault on his privacy by photographing him without prior permission.

He pointed out that the defendant was convicted in the criminal case by a final judgment that ruled his imprisonment with detention, while the court of first instance in the civil lawsuit ruled obliging the defendant to pay him 5000 dirhams as moral compensation, and rejected the part of the financial compensation and interest, and obligated the plaintiff as a convicted person in favor of 75% of Expenses.

The appellant did not accept the ruling, appealed against it before the Court of Appeal, asked for his appeal to be accepted in form, and in its subject matter to annul the judgment, and to adjudicate him in all of his requests in the appealed case, crying out for the judgment violation of the law and the error in its application, and not paying attention to what he spent during his litigation against his opponent, and for the diminution of the amount of compensation awarded Him, and obligate him to part of the expenses.

The appellant submitted a memorandum to respond to the appeal, requesting that the judgment be rejected for the maliciousness of the appealed case due to a previous commercial dispute between them, and he filed a subsidiary appeal against the judgment of a court of first instance, alleging that the judgment violated the law and the error in its application because the appellant was not originally entitled to compensation, as he had no harm or What he takes into consideration is not to publish what was taken of him in terms of photos or to use them in an abusive way, requesting that his subsidiary appeal be accepted in form, and in the matter, to annul the appealed judgment and reject the case.

The Court of Appeal clarified that the final court has the power of the adjudic order in what it has decided between the litigants in an explicit or implicit and definitive manner, and when the judgment has this power, it prevents the litigants in the case in which it was issued from returning to discussing the matter in which it was decided, even with legal evidence or Realism not previously raised.

She indicated that, according to the criminal ruling, an offense was issued by the sub-appellant of the original appellant by assaulting his privacy, in the pictures he had taken on his phone while he was in a government agency, which was a reason for criminal punishment of him with imprisonment and suspension under the final criminal court.

The court ruled to accept the two appeals in form, and in their subject matter to reject the subsidiary appeal from the adjudged person, and to amend the appealed decision by partially canceling it, as it was decided by the judiciary to pay compensation and interest to the original appellant, and what obligated him as well as 75% of the expenses of the appealed case, and the judgment again for the original appellant with a material compensation The amount of 10 thousand dirhams, so that the total amount of his compensation becomes 15 thousand dirhams and an interest of 5% on the total amount above, and the subsidiary appellant is obligated to pay the lawsuit expenses and the expenses of the two current appeals, and to support the appealed judgment otherwise.

The

plaintiff demanded to bind the defendant to 500 thousand dirhams in compensation for his material and moral damages.

Follow our latest local and sports news, and the latest political and economic developments via Google news