The "appeal" separates a dispute between a married couple over the ownership of a car

The Court of Appeal in Abu Dhabi canceled a ruling of the Court of First Instance requiring a wife to return a Mercedes car to her husband and transfer the ownership in his name, after claiming to have bought it and registered it in her name due to traffic offenses registered in his name, and the Court of Appeal ruled to cancel the appealed judgment, and the judgment again to reject the case, noting that the appealed ruling In it, he turned away from the title deed of the car, which states that it is for the appellant, and her possession of it is continuous and quiet.

In the details, a man filed a lawsuit with the court of first instance against his wife, demanding that the defendant pay him 120,000 dirhams, or return a car and assign it to him, indicating that he had bought a "Mercedes" car and registered it in the name of the defendant, his wife, due to registered traffic offenses. In his name, and due to disagreements between him and his wife, the latter took the car and did not deliver it to him, and the court of the first degree of presence obliged the defendant to return the car, and obliged her to transfer her ownership in the name of the plaintiff to the competent authorities, and obligated the defendant to fees, expenses and attorney fees.

The court established its judiciary on the basis that it had heard the witnesses for proof and denial, and saw in the statements of the prosecution witnesses evidence of the validity of what the plaintiff claims, and directed him to take the complementary oath after that and swear it to the session, while the court was not satisfied with the testimony of the defense witnesses, which proved to the court the validity of what the husband claims of his ownership The car is the subject of the lawsuit, and that it was registered in the name of his wife because of traffic violations against him.

The defendant appealed against the ruling, and the wife indicated in her appeal that the appealed judgment was similar to a mistake in applying the law, failure to cause, and contradicted the fixed papers, since it is proven that her ownership of the car is fixed in writing and with official documents.

While the court made it clear that the appellant did not present any reasonable justification in his claim of substituting the appellant to register the car in her name, and it ruled to accept the appeal formally, and to cancel the appealed judgment.

Follow our latest local and sports news, and the latest political and economic developments via Google news