Referral of 3 young men to court for indecent assault on the public road

The judgment issued against the first accused in absentia.

Archives

A partial civil court in Ras al-Khaimah has decided to suspend a lawsuit filed by a girl against three accused of Gulf nationality, who were exposed to her by saying in a way that violated her modesty on the public road, until the criminal judgment against one of the accused is finally issued.

In detail, a girl of Arab nationality filed a civil lawsuit in which she demanded that the three defendants pay her 50,000 dirhams, compulsory compensation for the material damage she suffered, after the Criminal Court ruled to fine each accused 5,000 dirhams, for what was charged against them.

The verdict was not accepted by the second and third defendants, which led them to appeal against it, and the court ruled to accept the appeal formally, and in the matter to reject it, and uphold the appealed judgment, while the first defendant did not appeal the judgment because the judgment was not announced.

The case papers stated that the three defendants subjected the victim to insult, verbal harassment and verbal harassment, and harassed her and intercepted her in cars.

The case papers indicated that the victim had filed a communication against the defendants, and reported that they heard it an inappropriate word on the public road, and that she had previously accused the second accused of having exposed her on the road, as he lived near her mother’s residence, and that the third accused shouted at her.

She added that one of the defendants was driving his vehicle, and the second accused stood inside the vehicle, pulled his head out of it, and shouted at her while she was driving her vehicle, echoing the phrase "Hi Hai", with the intention of harassing her, and the third defendant shook her by greeting her in English.

A partial civil court affirmed in its verdict that it is decided in the Federal Supreme Court that the criminal judgment issued in the criminal case is authentic, and that civil courts are bound by it in cases that have not been decided by a final judgment, provided that the criminal judgment is final.

She added that the convicted person must be confronted with the verdict or at his place of residence, until he initiates an appeal against him with the opposition or appeal, or misses their deadlines, and becomes a final judgment.

She pointed out that the documents established that the judgment issued against the first accused in absentia was not implemented, and the papers were empty of his obtaining the declaration of the judgment or the appeal against it, and that the court established that the first accused did not announce the judgment in absentia, and then the judgment did not become final until he had the authority before the court The civil case, and until the court is committed to what the judgment will end, and then the case must be stopped with him, until the criminal case is decided by a final ruling for the first accused.

Follow our latest local and sports news, and the latest political and economic developments via Google news