Former Secretary-General of the League of Arab States, Amr Moussa, settled the debate about the League’s role regarding the dissolution of the Arab rejection of normalization with Israel, by saying that "the League cannot prevent any country from normalizing with Israel."

After decades of rejection, the normalization train resumed its journey to join the UAE on August 13, passing through Bahrain on September 11, then Sudan on October 23, and arriving in Morocco on December 11th.

In televised statements broadcast last Friday, Amr Moussa said that "the current secretary of the Arab League cannot tell any country to print or not with Israel, and he cannot tell any country to fight Israel."

It is noteworthy that the Arab League previously had practical positions, not just words, regarding Egypt signing a peace agreement with Israel in 1979, and following it, it decided to move its headquarters from Cairo, suspend Egypt's membership and boycott it economically and diplomatically.

However, recently the ceiling of Arab ambition has reached from the university’s role to just waiting for statements of denunciation and condemnation, but some were disappointed even in the mere issuance of these statements.

Arab citizens are now asking about the role of the League and its position on normalization in light of the failure to reach a comprehensive peace agreement that guarantees the establishment of a Palestinian state with East Jerusalem as its capital, which was stipulated in the Arab initiative in 2002, in which it was stated that "a just and comprehensive peace is a strategic choice for Arab countries to be achieved in light of International legitimacy, and it requires a corresponding commitment, affirmed by Israel in this regard. "

The Crown Prince of Saudi Arabia at the time, Prince Abdullah bin Abdul Aziz, called for the complete withdrawal of Israel from all Arab territories occupied since 1967, in implementation of Security Council resolutions (242 and 338), which were reinforced by the decisions of the 1991 Madrid Conference and the principle of land for peace, and for the establishment of an independent Palestinian state. It is sovereign and its capital is East Jerusalem, in return for the Arab states to establish normal relations in the framework of a comprehensive peace with Israel.

Normalization is worthless in this case

Commenting on the silence of the Arab League, former Egyptian parliamentarian Suleiman Saleh said, “Knowledge is one of the most important sources of power, and reality reveals many facts that could contribute to achieving victory, and the most important of which is that some Arab regimes were establishing secret relations with Israel that used These regimes are to confront the Arab Spring and plot coups, to prevent the nation from establishing democratic systems. "

Speaking to Al-Jazeera Net, Saleh, who works as a professor of media and public opinion at Cairo University, affirmed that the Arab League had lost its role, importance and function, and was unable to take a position on normalization and abandoned the issue of the first nation, which is the Palestinian issue.

However, "I, as a professor of public opinion, challenge any Arab regime to allow an independent center to conduct a public opinion poll to know the position of the Arab peoples towards normalization with Israel, which has ruined the country and impoverished the people," stressing that the peoples reject normalization and see that Israel is an entity that has usurped the land of Palestine, which is what Israel knows it well.

He stressed that Israel knows that normalization with the regimes will have no value when the new wave of the Arab Spring comes, adding that when people revolt, they will go directly to the Israeli embassy and throw stones at it, as the people of Egypt did in the revolution of 25 January 2011.

What is the secret of the university coup?

In turn, a former member of the Foreign Relations Committee of the Egyptian Parliament, Muhammad Imad Saber, explained this great difference in the positions of the Arab League, in the past and present, because it went through stages that differed according to the different types of rulers, as it had good national positions in the past regarding the Palestinian issue as well as the October War, and also a treaty. Camp David, but things changed a lot since the early nineties of the last century in conjunction with the Iraqi invasion of Kuwait, which caused a deep rift within the university.

In his speech to Al-Jazeera Net, Saber explained that since that moment, thought and measures were taken to change the beliefs of the Arab Gulf states and prevail over local interests, indicating that what strengthened this coup within the university was the advent of the Arab Spring revolutions, the greatest threat to the Gulf rulers, where the kings and princes realized that the Arab protection umbrella There is no safety for it and everyone is in danger or protection without America, and that America's arrival will only be through Israel.

He added, "Then there were the counter-revolutions that drove the revolutionaries and brought in the agents, mediators and brokers, and they are members of the Arab League today that do not represent the regimes of government but the persons of the proxy rulers who rule with the iron fist in order to preserve power, and this is a protection for the borders and existence of Israel, and protection for the king and authority of Arab rulers. .

In a message marking the New Year, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu said, "We have reached 4 agreements within less than 4 months. This is just the beginning, as more and more Arab countries reformulate their traditional hostile stances towards Israel to seek reconciliation with the Jewish state."

Netanyahu described the form of the new relations as having gone to the farthest point, adding, "Instead of considering Israel its enemy, it views us as a friend, as an ally, but rather as a vital ally and vital partner to it," as he put it.

On the other hand, the head of the political bureau of the Islamic Resistance Movement, Hamas, Ismail Haniyeh, said that normalizing relations with Israel is a treacherous stab in the back of the Palestinian people, a major political sin, and behavior harmful to the nation's interests and national security in the foreseeable and strategic term.

This came in a message that Haniyeh sent to the leaders and leaders of more than 30 Arab and Islamic countries, according to a statement issued by Hamas, and the statement did not reveal the identity of the leaders who received the message.

In his message, Haniyeh said that Hamas "pursued, with regret and disapproval, the conclusion of agreements to normalize relations with some Arab countries with the Zionist entity under the auspices of the American administration," stressing that the movement considers very dangerous any step of normalization with the Israeli occupation in the Arab and Islamic world.