He beat him, broke into his house, and accused him of having an affair with his wife

Abu Dhabi Elementary School rejects a compensation lawsuit filed by a man against his neighbor

The Abu Dhabi Court of First Instance ruled to reject a compensation lawsuit filed by a man against his neighbor, demanding that the latter pay him an amount of 500 thousand dirhams in compensation for the material and moral damages resulting from his beating and accusing him of breaking into his residence, and that he has a relationship with his wife, and the court ruled that the case may not be considered for the previous decision. .

In the details, a man filed a lawsuit against his neighbor, in which he demanded the ruling obligating him to pay him 500 thousand dirhams, in compensation for the grave material and moral damages he incurred, indicating that he had a neighborly relationship with the defendant, and the latter came to him claiming, contrary to the truth, that he He was present on the roof of the property in his place of residence, and the defendant denied that, and asked him to review the camera of his place of residence, and after accompanying him to the location of the camera, he hit him, which resulted in the injuries shown in the forensic report, which led to a permanent disability in his nose. It was estimated at 5%.

The plaintiff indicated that, in addition to the assault on him, the defendant attributed untrue facts and accusations to him, accusing him of having a relationship with his wife, and that he was caught inside his home.

The Criminal Court ruled to punish the defendant with imprisonment for a period of one year, to pay the victim an amount of 10 thousand dirhams as an estimated compensation, to reject the civil lawsuit, and to oblige the person who filed it to pay fees and fees.

The plaintiff filed a compensation lawsuit before the Abu Dhabi Court of First Instance, in which he said that the defendant claimed that he had a relationship with his wife, and that he broke into his residence and violated his inviolability, unlike the truth, which caused him severe material and moral damages, in addition to what he suffered from attending the sessions and disrupting his work, and what He suffered psychological and moral damage estimated at 500 thousand dirhams.

The court rejected the case, and stated in the merits of the verdict that it is proven from the case documents that the plaintiff is claiming compensation based on the criminal judgment, and the documents were proven that the victim had filed a civil claim in the criminal case, and the court ruled for him compensation for the injuries he sustained, indicating that It is decided to abstain from combining civil compensation and indemnity, or blood money, in addition to the fact that the two claims are the same, and it is not possible to return to discussing what these previous judgments have settled on, even with new factual or legal evidence presented in the present case, and the court ruled that the case is not considered permissible. For previous decisions, and obligating the plaintiff to pay fees and expenses.

It is proven from the case documents that the plaintiff is claiming compensation, based on the criminal judgment.

Follow our latest local and sports news, and the latest political and economic developments via Google news