In a trial over the US presidential election, the Attorney General of Southern Texas, near President Trump, demanded that the election results of the four states be virtually disapproved, the Federal Supreme Court ruled to dismiss the case.
In a trial that the Trump camp emphasized, American media reported that in other court battles, "the president is unlikely to win."
Over the presidential election, the Attorney General of Texas, close to President Trump, claimed that the election system had changed against the law in four states, including the fierce battles of eastern Pennsylvania and Midwestern Michigan, based on election results. I was asking the electorate not to vote.
The United States Supreme Court ruled on the 11th that it dismissed the proceedings, saying that it "has not been shown its apparent judicial significance."
The Supreme Court said that the Supreme Court wanted a hearing in the Supreme Court, partly because of the majority of the nine judges, including three nominated by President Trump.
In addition, President Trump himself requested participation in this trial, and the US media was rejected because the camp side emphasized that more than 100 Republican members of the House of Representatives expressed their support. "There is little chance that President Trump will win," he said of some of the court battles that are still ongoing.