The "court" was not satisfied with the evidence

A man is acquitted of the charge of stealing 6 girls

The Federal Supreme Council rejected the prosecution’s appeal against the “appeal” ruling.

The Federal Supreme Court rejected the Public Prosecution’s appeal against a ruling that acquitted a man of the charge of stealing six girls inside their homes, claiming that it was from the investigations, confirming the lack of evidence on the accusation.

In the details, the Public Prosecution referred an accused to the criminal trial, accusing him of entering a house by force, claiming that he was a member of the investigation, and stole six girls inside their residence, and detained their freedom, demanding that he be punished.

The Court of First Instance ruled to punish the accused with one year in prison for all charges against him in connection with the charges, and imposed the fees, then the Court of Appeal ruled his innocence, so the prosecution appealed this ruling before the Federal Supreme Court.

The Public Prosecution said that the appealed ruling did not discuss the evidence of the case that was filled with papers, including the fingerprint found at the scene of the accident, which matched the fingerprint of the accused, and that the judgment justified the innocence of the accused for reasons that are not justifiable and are not consistent with the facts of the case.

For its part, the Federal Supreme Court rejected the appeal, affirming that the trial court may rule acquittal whenever it doubts the validity of attributing the accusation to the accused, or its suspicion of the validity of the evidence, when its judgment includes what indicates that it has examined the case and surrounded its circumstances and the evidence on which it was based The accusation is with insight and insight.

She emphasized that it is also decided that the basic principle in criminal judgments is that they are based on certainty and not on suspicion and speculation, and that if the possibility is addressed, the reasoning becomes invalid, and that the principle in the criminal court is that the judge is convinced of the evidence presented to him, and it is not permissible to ask him to take Specific directory.

She added that the verdict discussed the evidence on which the accusation was based, and ruled the innocence of the accused on the basis of saying that he was not satisfied with that evidence.

Follow our latest local and sports news, and the latest political and economic developments via Google news