▲ The Defense Science Research Institute celebrates its 50th anniversary this year


Last Thursday (October 29) Kang Eun-ho, deputy chief of the Defense Acquisition Program Administration (hereinafter referred to as the Bangsaeng Administration), retired.

Jacheon Tacheon, the next Director of the Defense Agency and the next Vice Minister of Defense, suddenly left office, causing the Bangsaeng Administration, the Ministry of National Defense, and the defense industry to be disturbed.

(▶[Interview file] Second Person of the Radiation Administration's application for sudden'dismissal'…different interpretations)



From about ten days before Kang's retirement, the prospect of his next destination unexpectedly emerged as the head of the Defense Science Research Institute.

The real names of senior officials in the Blue House Security Office, Minda, as head of the Defense Science Research Institute, also circulated around the Ministry of Defense.

The prospect is from a certain source, but the prospect is only a prospect.

It wasn't officially confirmed, so I couldn't believe it.



The Defense Science Research Institute is a place where the best experts in defense science gather to develop weapons for independent defense.

There are trial and error and wrong practices, but it is a place where many researchers risk their lives to make good domestic weapons.

Mr. Kang is not a defense scientist.

I am a general public official from the administrative examination.

I tried hard not to take responsibility for the defects of the Defense Science Research Institute.

In addition, the qualifications for the test were difficult, so the deputy director of the Bangsaengwon could not take over the position of the director of the Defense Science Research Institute.



No way is becoming true.

The Defense Science Research Institute announced a public offering of the collection yesterday (2nd), but the eligibility for the test has changed.

'High-ranking officials of the Radiation Administration' were suddenly added to the eligibility for the test.

Anyone can look at the rules for the former deputy chief Kang, so to speak, it is the Great Inseolbeop (爲人設法).

“The opportunity will be equal, the process will be fair, and the outcome will be just,” the government launched, initiating the unequal and unfair'parachute' procedure that would only exist in the authoritarian era.

The results also seem to have nothing to do with the definition.



● Qualifications for the Director of the Defense Science Research Institute, which has changed suddenly The qualifications for the application of the Director of the



Defense Science Research Institute are those who do not qualify for the disqualification for the appointment of public officials and must meet one of the four conditions.

① Persons with experience in defense policy-related departments as a reserve officer or higher, ② high-ranking officials at the Ministry of National Defense, who have worked in the field of weapons acquisition and defense science and technology for more than 5 years, and ③ Persons who have worked for more than 10 years as a lead researcher at a government-affiliated research institute in the field of science and technology , ④ Those who have worked for 5 years or more with a director level or higher in a large defense industry.

It was like this a few days ago.




Yesterday (2nd), the announcement for the director of the Defense Science Research Institute published by the Defense Science Research Institute was small, but significantly changed.

Article ② has been

changed to a person who has worked in the field of weapons acquisition and defense science and technology for more than 5 years at the level of a senior civil servant at the

Ministry of Defense and

Defense Acquisition Program Administration

.

There was just one more word for'Defense Agency'.

It is irrespective of why you added it (不問可知).




The Ministry of Defense sent new recruitment rules to the Defense Science Research Institute before and after the day of former Deputy General Kang's retirement.

The Defense Science Research Institute didn't even know that the eligibility for admission was changing.

A researcher at the Defense Science Research Institute criticized "the best defense science experts presented the future blueprint of the Defense Science Research Institute and the roadmap for reform, and they had to be selected as directors. .

An executive of the Defense Science Research Institute lamented, "The Moon Jae-in government, which pursues equality, fairness, and justice, should not have the chief defense science officer in this way." I did.



● Are you qualified as the Director of the



Defense Science Research Institute

?

This year marks the 50th anniversary of the Defense Science Research Institute.

It's a significant year, but I suffered measles due to a massive confidentiality case by retired researchers.

The incident was made known to the world by the SBS report on April 26th.

The management supervisory agency, the Radiation Administration, hastily investigated and released the results on June 25th.

At this time, this is the former conductor Eunho Kang.




He said, "It was in mid-April when the Agency became aware of this incident."

He said he was frustrated because he didn't even know the radiation hall.

I was puzzled.

In mid-April, SBS reporters were in full swing covering the confidentiality case.

It makes no sense that journalists and high-ranking members of the Radiation Administration knew about the Defense Science Research Institute incident at the same time.



In fact, the Radiation Administration got the case right at the end of last year.

From December 15th to December 20th last year, a joint security investigation team of the Defense Science Research Center was operated.

It consists of 5 employees of the Radiation Administration, including the Director of the Technology Protection Division of the Radiation Administration, 3 employees of the National Intelligence Service, and 2 employees of the security support company.

It was led by the Radiation Agency.

An official from the Defense Science Research Institute said, "The data obtained by the joint team at the time are the same as those obtained by the police currently investigating the leaked case", and "The Agency cannot know the details of the investigation at the end of last year."



The joint team did not handle the case in time for some reason, but reluctantly reported it to the police in mid-April.

That's why I can't believe what Deputy General Manager Kang said, "I only recognized it in mid-April."

If the National Defense Agency had properly supervised the Defense Science Research Institute, it would have to prevent the leak in the first place, or at least turn the case over to the police at the end of last year.

Radiation Office didn't do both.

Even if you swear to cover it, there is nothing to say, it is very unconventional.

Former Deputy General Manager Eun-ho Kang is also responsible for a lot.

Still, if you want to be the head of the Defense Science Research Institute, something is wrong.



● The real qualification of the



director

of the

Defense Science Research Institute is not a place for those in power to gather together.

It should not be a place to receive grace and return grace.

The next head of the Defense Science Research Institute must be the best defense scientist who can lead the development of advanced domestic weapons.

Researchers will develop a good weapon with all my convictions and excitement, but personally, I will motivate myself by dreaming of a future holding position.

That's why the place of the director is also important.



An official from the Defense Quality and Technology Institute said, "Former Deputy Director Kang has worked at the Blue House of the Lee Myung-bak administration for a long time, but the Park Geun-hye administration and the Moon Jae-in administration have also succeeded." "There is a distance."

The Defense Science Research Institute is left to real defense scientists, and the former Deputy Director Kang challenged the political position of the Director General of Radiation Administration or the Vice Minister of National Defense.



Who changed the qualification for the examination of the Director of the Defense Science Research Institute?

There is no news that the Minister of Defense has discussed and decided on a formal agenda at the board of directors of the Defense Science Research Institute, which is the chairman of the board.

Some people have been instructed to change the eligibility rules for the test.

The Ministry of Defense's Personnel Welfare Office is well aware of it.

He is a prominent figure in the government's security line.

It is probably the same person whose real name was mentioned by pushing former Deputy Director Kang as Director of the Defense Science Research Institute from last month.