Foreign Ministry Spokesperson Hua Chunying's regular press conference on September 2, 2020
At the invitation of Saudi Foreign Minister Faisal bin Farhan Al Saud, the chairman of the G20, State Councilor and Foreign Minister Wang Yi will attend the G20 foreign ministers video conference in Beijing on September 3.
The meeting will discuss topics such as cross-border movement of people and border management measures.
CCTV reporter: Recently the US House of Representatives New Coronavirus Special Investigation Committee disclosed the White House investigation report that US government officials publicly stated that they were involved in the epidemic were inconsistent with the content of the report, and deliberately covered up the epidemic. Since June, more than 58,000 Americans have died. The lives of millions of Americans are threatened. In addition, an investigation by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention of the United States found that 1 out of every 20 medical staff in the United States has been infected with the new crown virus, 69% of which have never been detected. More and more people believe that the US's anti-epidemic performance is in sharp contrast with China. What's your opinion?
Hua Chunying: I have no intention of judging the US anti-epidemic, but I remember that Dr. Fauci once said that the numbers will not deceive people.
Yesterday, CCTV launched an extraordinary and moving "first lesson of school", "Republic Medal" winner, National Health Commission high-level expert group leader Zhong Nanshan, and "People's Hero" national honorary title Zhang Boli , Zhang Dingyu, Chen Wei and other medical research experts vividly told the touching story of China’s fight against the epidemic.
The program is divided into three chapters: unity, science, and responsibility. I think these three key words provide a good answer to the "secret" why China can achieve major strategic results in fighting the epidemic in such a short period of time.
As Academician Zhong Nanshan said, Wuhan closed the Lihan Channel on January 23. This heroic city has undergone a full 76-day, 1814-hour blockade, in exchange for reducing infections by at least 700,000 people in China.
This is our country, and the first thing to do is to grasp human life.
Human life is the most important human right!
We have saved so many lives. This is the manifestation of our greatest human rights.
The Chinese party and government have always adhered to the lofty concept of "life first, people first" to carry out epidemic prevention and control work, which not only protects the life safety and health of the Chinese people to the greatest extent, but also contributes to the fight against the epidemic and the protection of the people of the world. Life safety and health have made important contributions.
On January 23, when China closed the passage from Han to Han, there was only one confirmed case of new coronary pneumonia officially announced by the United States.
On January 31, the United States suspended direct flights between China and the United States.
On February 2, the United States closed its borders to all Chinese citizens. At that time, the United States announced only more than 10 confirmed cases.
The timeline is clear and clear.
After China cut off the spread of the epidemic to the world, in just a few months, why the domestic epidemic situation in the United States has changed so much? This is a question worthy of serious consideration and in-depth investigation.
We sympathize with the current difficult situation of the American people and hope and wish them an early victory over the epidemic.
Macao Monthly Reporter: We have noticed that State Councilor and Minister of Foreign Affairs Wang Yi has just concluded his trip to Italy, the Netherlands, Norway, France, and Germany. Some media commented that this is China's move to seek a diplomatic breakthrough from Europe. what opinions do the Chinese have on this issue?
Hua Chunying: This statement is not accurate. To be precise, this is a very important strategic communication between China and European countries in the context of rising uncertainties in the current international situation.
The world today is facing a choice between multilateral and unilateral, open and closed, cooperation and confrontation, and China and Europe have extensive and important consensus on these issues.
During the visit, State Councilor Wang Yi conducted candid and in-depth exchanges with the leaders and foreign ministers of the five countries. The five countries all expressed that they attach great importance to relations with China and hope to restart exchanges and cooperation with China as soon as possible. They are all willing to strengthen communication and coordination with China to jointly respond. Global challenges.
At the same time, they all expressed concern that the global epidemic will continue to spread, the world economy is facing a deep recession, that unilateralism will continue to rise, multilateralism will be severely impacted, and that artificial “decoupling” and division will be created, and competition and confrontation will intensify in the international situation.
China and the EU reached three important consensuses:
The first is to uphold multilateralism and resist unilateralism.
The strongest voice of the five European countries is to resolutely defend multilateralism, believing that China and Europe must strengthen coordination, adhere to multilateral concepts, take multilateral actions, abide by multilateral agreements, and strengthen multilateral institutions.
The second is to strengthen unity and cooperation and oppose the "decoupling" of division.
Both sides advocate strengthening China-EU cooperation in the fight against the epidemic, resuming personnel exchanges and pragmatic cooperation between the two parties as soon as possible, so as to make "China-EU contributions" to the recovery of world economic growth.
Both parties also agreed to jointly resist the incitement of division, "decoupling" and confrontation, and avoid the world from returning to the "law of the jungle."
The third is to maintain the overall situation of China-EU relations and properly manage differences.
Both sides believe that it is necessary to adhere to the positioning of China-EU comprehensive strategic partnership and grasp the dominant aspect of China-EU relations.
With regard to the differences between China and the EU, we must deepen our understanding through equal dialogue, increase mutual trust through candid communication, achieve win-win results through mutually beneficial cooperation, and manage and control them through constructive methods.
This year marks the 45th anniversary of the establishment of diplomatic relations between China and the EU. Both sides have a strong desire to work together to promote greater development of China-EU relations. In the next step, there are six things that China and the EU need to do together:
The first is to make preparations for the next stage of China-EU high-level exchanges, and point out the direction for China-EU cooperation.
The second is to complete the China-EU investment agreement negotiations within this year.
The third is to sign the "China-EU Cooperation 2025 Strategic Plan" as soon as possible.
The fourth is to build a green partnership between China and Europe.
The fifth is to strengthen cooperation in the digital economy.
The sixth is to strengthen support for multilateral institutions.
Facts have proved that while the development of China-EU relations has brought great benefits to the people of both sides, it has also made important contributions to world peace, stability and development.
China is willing to work together with the European side to not only promote the development of China-EU relations, but also contribute more positive energy to safeguarding multilateralism, safeguarding free trade, and promoting world peace and stability.
Taiwan Guoguang reporter: According to reports, on August 31, the Sudanese Transitional Government and the main domestic opposition armed alliance "Sudan Revolutionary Front" signed a peace agreement in the capital of South Sudan, Juba, and the domestic peace process in Sudan has made significant progress. What is China's comment?
Hua Chunying: China is a friendly country to Sudan. We welcome and support the signing of peace agreements between the Sudanese Transitional Government and relevant factions in the country.
We are willing to work with the international community to continue to play a constructive role in promoting the peaceful and stable development of Sudan.
ITV reporter: ITV interviewed a doctor in Turkey. The doctor said that she participated in the population control plan adopted by the Chinese Communist Party in Xinjiang. Are Uighur women subjected to forced sterilization or abortion? Is this the reason for the decline in the Uighur population? Another US media revealed that the US is planning to label China's treatment of Xinjiang Uyghur Muslims as "genocide". What's your comment?
Hua Chunying: On Xinjiang-related issues, individual countries and people have made too many lies, including what they quoted from someone.
Facts have repeatedly proved that many people are actually just actors who are used by others.
Therefore, when you hear someone say that Xinjiang has done something to the Uyghur minority, you should use your own judgment and carefully distinguish the authenticity.
Since you care, I would like to introduce it.
First of all, I want to say that the so-called China's persecution of Uyghur Muslims in Xinjiang is originally a false proposition.
This is a sensational topic deliberately concocted by some anti-China forces. It is a farce to smear and smear China for the purpose of containing and suppressing China.
There are 56 ethnic groups in China, and the Uyghur ethnic group is an equal member of the big family of the Chinese nation. The Chinese government has always treated the legitimate rights and interests of ethnic minorities equally.
China's population policy has long given preferential treatment to ethnic minorities, including Uyghurs.
You mentioned the issue of Uighur population control. In fact, the Uighur population in Xinjiang has been growing continuously.
In 1978, the Uighur population in Xinjiang was 5.55 million. According to the latest statistics released by Xinjiang, it had reached 12.71 million in 2018, more than double the number 40 years ago.
In the eight years from 2010 to 2018 alone, the Uyghur population in Xinjiang increased by 2.54 million, an increase of 25%, which was higher than the increase in the entire Xinjiang population and more than 10 times the increase in the Han population in the same period.
Some media revealed that some people in the US are planning to label the situation of Xinjiang Uyghurs with "genocide."
As I just said, the Uyghur population in Xinjiang has increased from 5.55 million to 12.71 million. The increase is clear. How can "genocide" come about?
On the contrary, the mass expulsion, assimilation, and massacre of Indians in American history led to the reduction of the Indian population from 5 million to 250,000. This is "genocide."
I must also point out that the material used by some foreign anti-China forces to smear and attack China's Xinjiang policy basically comes from a so-called German "scholar" Zheng Guoen.
The media has repeatedly disclosed that Zheng Guoen is actually the backbone of the "Xinjiang Education and Training Center Research Group" set up under the control of the US intelligence agency. He makes a living by concocting Xinjiang-related rumors and slandering China.
He quoted some data with ulterior motives, and invited several "actors" to take turns on stage to act as so-called witnesses according to his forged "scripts" and "lines".
His act of spreading rumors and slander is very disgusting and should be severely punished and sanctioned by the law.
Regarding the Uyghur population issue you mentioned, the Xinjiang Autonomous Region government held a special press conference recently. I suggest you read it carefully.
I would also like to emphasize that when observing and commenting on China's affairs, we must base ourselves on facts, find out the real situation, and we must not listen to or believe it, let alone spread falsehoods.
At the same time, we welcome anyone in the international community who really cares about Xinjiang to go to Xinjiang to see with their own eyes how the ethnic minorities, including Uyghurs, Kazakhs and Hans live in harmony.
All rumors are self-defeating.
Xinhua News Agency reporter: According to reports, German Foreign Minister Maas said in a meeting with State Councilor Wang Yi that Germany and China emphasize the importance of retaining the comprehensive agreement on the Iranian nuclear issue. In addition, on September 1, the political director-general meeting of the Joint Commission on the Iranian Nuclear Comprehensive Agreement was held in Vienna. Can you tell us whether China and the EU have made any progress in safeguarding the Iran nuclear agreement?
Hua Chunying: China and the EU have always maintained close communication on safeguarding the comprehensive agreement on the Iranian nuclear issue.
As you said, China and Russia, Iran, France, Germany, the United Kingdom, and the European Union recently convened a joint committee on the comprehensive agreement on the Iranian nuclear issue.
The background of this meeting was that the United States tried to unilaterally hijack the UN Security Council to take illegal actions against Iran.
The head of the Arms Control Department of the Chinese Ministry of Foreign Affairs led a delegation to attend the meeting.
The meeting sent a clear message for all parties to safeguard the comprehensive agreement on the Iranian nuclear issue and the authority of the Security Council.
All parties at the meeting emphasized that the United States has long unilaterally announced its withdrawal from the comprehensive agreement and is no longer a participant in the agreement. It has no right to activate the Security Council’s "quick restoration of sanctions" mechanism against Iraq.
The parties reiterated that they will continue to discuss the implementation of the comprehensive agreement under the framework of the Joint Commission and welcome the consensus reached between the International Atomic Energy Agency and Iran on the issue of safeguards for Iran.
The Chinese side pointed out at the meeting that the United States has renounced its own international legal obligations, unilaterally withdrew from the comprehensive agreement, restored illegal unilateral sanctions on Iran and imposed long-arm jurisdiction, and at the same time tried its best to obstruct other parties from implementing the agreement. This is the source of tension in the Iranian nuclear situation. .
The U.S. illegal attempt at the Security Council has met with widespread opposition and is unlikely to succeed.
China reiterated that all parties should adhere to the consistent position of resolving differences through dialogue and consultation within the framework of the Joint Commission, and called on all parties to actively support the IAEA and Iran to implement the consensus on the safeguards mechanism.
At the same time, China also supports the establishment of another dialogue platform under the premise of maintaining the validity and authority of the comprehensive agreement to form a new consensus on maintaining regional peace and stability.
In short, China will work with all parties to stand on the right side of history, firmly uphold multilateralism, and continue to make unremitting efforts to promote the political and diplomatic resolution of the Iranian nuclear issue.
Reporter from NHK TV Station in Japan: According to Taiwan media reports, the Taiwan authorities have decided to enlarge the words "TAIWAN" and "TAIWAN PASSPORT" on the cover of the new version of the "passport" for Taiwan residents. What is China's comment?
Hua Chunying: No matter what small actions the DPP authorities make, the fact that Taiwan is an inalienable part of Chinese territory will not change.
China Daily reporter: According to reports, in response to the US sanctions against Chinese companies involved in the construction of South China Sea islands and reefs, the spokesperson of the Presidential Office of the Philippines stated on the 1st that the Philippines is an independent country. President Duterte will not prohibit relevant Chinese contractors from participating in Philippine infrastructure construction, and will continue to promote relevant projects. How does China respond to this?
Hua Chunying: A few days ago, China has clarified its position on the issue of US sanctions on Chinese companies involved in the construction of South China Sea islands and reefs.
We have noted the remarks made by the spokesperson of the Philippine Presidential Palace.
President Duterte regards economic recovery, maintenance and development of the people's well-being as the top priority of the current Philippine government, and pursues an independent foreign policy based on the national interests of the Philippines. This conforms to the fundamental interests of the country and people of the Philippines and is commendable.
The pragmatic cooperation between China and the Philippines has always been based on mutual respect, mutual benefit and win-win results, and all projects comply with the laws and regulations of the two countries.
In particular, the “Belt and Road” initiative has achieved positive results in the in-depth docking of the “Build, Build, Build” plan of the Philippines, which is increasingly benefiting the two countries and their peoples.
We are willing to continue to deepen practical cooperation in various fields with the Philippines.
Agence France-Presse: The US Department of Defense released a report on China's military strength, which specifically mentioned that China will double the number of nuclear warheads in the next ten years. What's your opinion?
Hua Chunying: The report of the US Department of Defense is the same as previous similar reports. It ignores facts and is full of prejudice.
China resolutely opposes making rash comments on China's national defense construction and deliberately distorting China's strategic intentions.
China's strategic intentions are transparent and consistent.
The Constitution of the People's Republic of China has clearly stipulated that China will adhere to the path of peaceful development and promote the construction of a community with a shared future for mankind.
China has always pursued a defensive national defense policy and is a builder of world peace, a contributor to global development, and a defender of international order.
The development of China's military power is precisely the growth of world peace forces.
China’s strengthening of national defense is to safeguard the country’s independence and sovereign territorial integrity, and to exercise the legitimate rights of a sovereign country. There is nothing wrong with it.
Everyone knows that China's military power is far from that of the United States. The US military expenditure is the sum of the nearly 10 countries behind it.
The U.S. playing up the issue of China's military power is nothing more than creating an excuse for it to further seek absolute superiority and hegemony in the military field.
We urge the US to abandon the outdated concepts of Cold War mentality and zero-sum game, stop publishing irresponsible reports year after year, look at China’s strategic intentions and national defense construction objectively and rationally, and do more to benefit Sino-US relations and the two militaries. Things, not the other way around.
Shenzhen Satellite TV reporter: According to reports, the Indian Ministry of Foreign Affairs and the Ministry of National Defense issued a statement recently saying that due to the timely action, the Indian army took "preemptive" measures on the south bank of Pangong Lake, successfully preventing China's unilateral attempt to change the status quo. In the incident, Chinese soldiers approached the Indian army in a military vehicle, and the two sides had a verbal dispute but no physical conflict. The Indian army has deployed troops on four high grounds on the Indian side of the actual control line. How does China respond to this?
Hua Chunying: You mentioned that the Indian side stated that the Indian army had taken the so-called "preemptive" action.
As the Chinese saying goes, “there is no silver three hundred taels”, and the Indian side’s statement of “no tactics” fully proves that this incident is the first time that the Indian army has illegally crossed the line and provoked, and unilaterally changes the status quo in the border area, which violates the agreement between the two parties. And important consensus first.
Since the beginning of this year, the Indian side has repeatedly violated bilateral agreements and important consensuses on the western section of the China-India border, attempting to unilaterally use force to change the status quo, undermine the peace and stability of the border area, and cause tension in the border area. The responsibility rests solely with India.
China has maintained great restraint and prevented the situation from expanding.
Currently, the two sides are maintaining communication through military and diplomatic channels.
China urges the Indian side to strictly restrain the front-line troops, immediately stop all provocative actions, immediately withdraw all illegal crossovers, and immediately stop any actions that cause tension and complicate the situation.
It is hoped that the Indian side and China will meet each other halfway, earnestly implement the important consensus reached by the leaders of the two countries and the agreement signed by the two sides, and make practical efforts to maintain peace and tranquility in the border area.
Reuters reporter: The Indian side said that the "Tibetan troops" are an important part of the Indian army because they have the best combat capabilities in high-altitude areas. This force was established in the 1960s under the guidance of the CIA and is part of the "strategic exchanges" between the two sides. The Dalai Lama and the "Tibetan Government in Exile" support them in fighting alongside India. How does China view the "Tibetan exiles" joining the Indian army?
Hua Chunying: You mentioned that there are "exiled Tibetans" in the Indian army.
You might as well ask the Indian side.
There are a few words mentioned in your question, one is "the 1960s", there are also the "CIA" and "Tibetan in exile".
These words prompt people to think carefully about the ins and outs of Tibet-related issues and the role of the United States in it.
China's position is very clear. We firmly oppose any country to facilitate the activities of the "Tibet independence" forces to separatize and destroy China in any way.
As for the relationship between the so-called "Tibetans in exile" and the Indian border guards, I am also very curious. I hope you can do some in-depth investigations. If there is news and progress, I will thank you very much for sharing with us.
Reuters reporter: Has China decided to join the WHO New Coronary Vaccine Implementation Plan (COVAX)? If so, how much do you plan to contribute? Do you want to stabilize the vaccine supply for your country through participating in the project?
Hua Chunying: President Xi Jinping made it clear at the 73rd World Health Assembly that after China’s new crown vaccine is completed and put into use, it will be used as a global public product to make China’s vaccine accessible and affordable in developing countries. contribution.
This is highly consistent with the "New Coronary Pneumonia Vaccine Implementation Plan" aimed at ensuring that all countries have equal opportunities to obtain a suitable, safe and effective new coronary pneumonia vaccine.
China supports the "New Crown Vaccine Implementation Plan" and has been in communication with the WHO and other implementation plan sponsors.
Yesterday, relevant Chinese authorities and vaccine companies held a video conference with WHO, the Global Alliance for Vaccines and Immunization, and the Alliance for Epidemic Prevention Innovation to further exchange views on relevant issues and once again agreed to jointly promote the global R&D, production and distribution of the new crown vaccine jobs.
China's vaccine research and development companies have been working day and night to promote vaccine research and development in strict accordance with scientific laws and regulatory requirements, and have achieved gratifying results.
In fact, 9 vaccines developed in China have entered clinical trials, and 4 of these vaccines have been approved for overseas Phase III clinical trials, ranking among the top in the world.
In the process of vaccine research and development, we attach great importance to safety and effectiveness, and strictly follow international norms and relevant laws and regulations.
China has noticed the expectations of some countries on China in terms of vaccine research and development, production and distribution.
In fact, we have already cooperated with some countries.
China's words must be believed and deeds must be resolute.
We will continue to work to strengthen international cooperation in vaccine development, production and distribution.
At the same time, we also hope that other countries that have made positive progress in vaccine research and development can strengthen cooperation with China and contribute to the availability and affordability of vaccines.
Bloomberg reporter: Can you clearly state whether China will join COVAX? If not, why can't China make a decision? If you decide in the future, how long will it take?
Hua Chunying: The purpose of the "New Crown Vaccine Implementation Plan" is to ensure that all countries have equal opportunities to obtain suitable, safe and effective vaccines.
China has announced that once the vaccine is successfully developed and put into use, it will be used as a global public product to realize the availability and affordability of vaccines in developing countries.
I have already said that what China is currently doing is actually exactly the same as the "New Crown Vaccine Implementation Plan".
China supports the "New Crown Vaccine Implementation Plan" and has been in communication with the WHO and other sponsors.
Yesterday, we also had a video conference, and China will continue to maintain close communication with the WHO and the sponsors of relevant plans.